This was released for dapper today.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu Dapper)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Fixed since feisty
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
No. I'm using my dapper 1.4.4-x backports. Ditto for edgy but there are now
all replace with feisty.
I trust upstream enough, to backports on dapper ... gutsy the new 1.4.*
releases. Sorry, lame
excuse to not test it :(
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
Feisty got 1.4.4 so it is safe. But what happend to dapper and edgy? Did
somebody test the debdiff?
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94787
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
Debdiff against the version in Dapper. The package built without any
problem, however I have at the moment no way to test it. The fix is
trivial though and should also apply to the versions in breezy and edgy.
Russ Allbery said he will try to package 1.4.4 for Debian Experimental
this weekend. I
UVF Execption for feisty to get Openafs 1.4.4 (requires a sync from
Debian Experimental) in filed as #94787.
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://launchpad.net/bugs/94787
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
94787 is this bug ;) The UVFe is in Bug #96931
--
Openafs has a security hole with enabled suid
https://launchpad.net/bugs/94787
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Thanks for the report. I've linked to the CVE for this. If someone can
prepare debdiffs and test them, I can get them published.
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2007-1507
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed
--
Openafs has a
