This bug was fixed in the package mdadm - 3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2
---
mdadm (3.2.5-1ubuntu0.2) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* Patch udev-md-raid.rules to not auto-start arrays based on detection
of ddf or isw (imsm) signatures; this conflicts with dmraid usage in
precise and requi
Scrap last comment, with update package from -proposed the device names
are correctly preserved across reboots as /dev/md_d1, /dev/md_d1p1 and
/dev/md_d1p2. So everything is fine with respect to partitionable raids
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Everything below was done on precise:
I do agree that the standard partitionable mdadm raid devices
(/dev/md_dNNpXX) were not supported in precise, but now are supported
with the version from -proposed.
But please note that even though I created /dev/md_d1, /dev/md_d1p1 and
/dev/md_d1p2 the devic
@ Steve Langasek,
The incremental assembly is only triggered on [format]_raid_members.
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="md_end"
KERNEL!="md*", GOTO="md_end"
So something needs to be a block device and match a name md*. The current $ man
4 md , reserves:
/dev/mdn
/dev/md/n
/dev/md/
Dmitrijs, is there any (theoretical) risk of false positives here, with
the partitionable raid rules becoming active and as a result
*mis*assembling something which isn't meant to be a partitionable raid?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags ad
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage
Dmitrijs: What's the status of the SRU? are we still on target for the
point release?
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
** Description changed:
-
[IMPACT]
- * Partitionable raid1 arrays following the /dev/md_d[0-9]* naming
+ * Partitionable raid1 arrays following the /dev/md_d[0-9]* naming
convention were ignored by the default udev settings.
- * Thus it prevents booting, if rootfs is on the partition
** Description changed:
- Partitionable raid1 arrays following the /dev/md_d[0-9]* naming convention
are ignored by default udev settings.
- They seem to work just fine with the following change:
- $ diff -u /lib/udev/rules.d/65-mdadm-blkid.rules /etc/udev/rules.d/
- --- /lib/udev/rules.d/65-m
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage not
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-12.04.1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage
** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Dmitrijs Ledkovs (dmitrij.ledkov)
Status: Fix Released
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
This bug was fixed in the package mdadm - 3.2.3-2ubuntu2
---
mdadm (3.2.3-2ubuntu2) quantal; urgency=low
* Minimizing the merge-diff from Debian:
+ debian/rules, debian/mdadm.udev, debian/mdadm.mdadm-blkid.udev:
Drop our own udev rules in favour of upstream's. Debian did s
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dmitrijs Ledkovs (dmitrij.ledkov)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
** Branch linked: lp:~dmitrij.ledkov/ubuntu/quantal/mdadm/merge
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage notification
Thank you for reporting this bug.
I opted the version that upstream uses, i.e.:
-KERNEL!="md[0-9]*", GOTO="mdadm_end"
+KERNEL!="md*", GOTO="mdadm_end"
Which works just as well. This will be uploaded to the archive soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968074
Title:
Partitionable raid ignored by 65-mdadm-blkid.rules
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
17 matches
Mail list logo
