This bug was fixed in the package paraview - 3.14.1-1ubuntu1
---
paraview (3.14.1-1ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
* Merge from Debian. Remaining changes:
- debian/control: Adjust Build-Depends on libboost and libhdf5 for
more Ubuntu-appropriate packages.
- debian/patch
With these changes, the package builds and installs on Precise afaict.
I also installed the Recommends and saw no problems. I was able to
`python -c "import paraview"` so given Stefano's comments above, I'll
upload the new package. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Ah, I see from your PPA you made this change:
diff -Nru paraview-3.14.0/debian/patches/fix_hdf5_mpi.patch
paraview-3.14.1/debian/patches/fix_hdf5_mpi.patch
--- paraview-3.14.0/debian/patches/fix_hdf5_mpi.patch 1970-01-01
00:00:00.0 +
+++ paraview-3.14.1/debian/patches/fix_hdf5_mpi.
Anton, when I build the sid version (3.14.1) + your backport.diff from
comment #10, I get a FTBFS. Was there some other changes you needed to
make that perhaps weren't included in your diff? (Also, could you use a
unified or context diff next time so patch can consume it?).
See attached build lo
I have uploaded a new version on PPA [1].
Please, consider a syncing from there.
Thanks
Anton
[1] https://launchpad.net/~gladky-anton/+archive/paraview
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
If there is a decision to sync a paraview from Debian Unstable, I
think it is better to do it earlier to have an opportunity to test it
before Precise-release.
Anton
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Please, see attached diff.
Thanks.
Anton
** Attachment added: "backport.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975417/+attachment/3030862/+files/backport.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
As with 3.14.0, it can't be synced, as it has a versioned Build-Depends
on libhdf5-dev, which is a virtual package in precise. Please provide a
patch for a sponsor to apply on the Debian version.
But aside from that, I'm quite happy to extend the FFe to cover 3.14.1
too.
--
You received this bug
I uploaded yesterday the version 3.14.1 into Debian Unstable [1]. It
is a bugfix
release from 2012/04/06 [2].
Please, consider the syncing of this version.
Thanks
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/paraview.html
[2] http://www.paraview.org/pipermail/paraview/2012-April/024578.html
Anton
--
Y
Looks reasonable to me. FFe granted.
I don't like the way paraview is sticking non-python-module shared
libraries into /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/, but that doesn't seem
to actually be problematic.
** Changed in: paraview (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug not
** Changed in: paraview (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: paraview (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975417
Title:
Para
ParaView 3.14 from your PPA seems to be working fine, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975417
Title:
ParaView conflicts with python-vtk, python-viper,...
To manage notification
I have a PPA, where 3.14 version is built and I am using it personally
on Precise [1].
> Anton, if I understood you correctly, you suggested me to get source
> package snapshot debian/3.12.0-4 from Debian git repository [2] and
> build a binary .deb package following for example instructions [3].
ParaView 3.14.0-1 from Debian [1] can't be installed because it has a
dependency libhdf5-7 that is not available in Precise.
Anton, if I understood you correctly, you suggested me to get source
package snapshot debian/3.12.0-4 from Debian git repository [2] and
build a binary .deb package followin
paraview has no reverse dependencies, although a few reverse-recommends,
and isn't seeded. So I'm certaintly open to granting a feature freeze
exception for 3.14.
I'd like to see that it builds and works on precise, though.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
Bonus points for checking
I meant debian/3.12.0-4, sorry.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975417
Title:
ParaView conflicts with python-vtk, python-viper,...
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
It is fixed in Debian already. But there is another newer upstream release 3.14
[1] instead of 3.12 in Precise.
I do not know, whether the release team agree to sync newer upstream version
during freeze (subscribing them).
Another opportunity is to get 3.12.0-6 debian version from the git-reposi
17 matches
Mail list logo
