This bug was fixed in the package update-manager - 1:0.156.14.6
---
update-manager (1:0.156.14.6) precise-proposed; urgency=low
* lp:~ember/update-manager/ubuntu.bug1002956:
- fix missing ReleaseNotesViewerWebkit.py support, thanks to
Pedro Fragoso (LP: #1002956)
* DistU
SRU verification for Precise:
I did the following test:
1. Installed Oneiric + updates
2. Copied meta-release and meta-release-proposed to /root/update-manager
3. Changed the entry URI to file:///root/update-manager in
/etc/update-manager/meta-release
4. Upgraded with update-manager -p
I couldn'
@Brian: I don't think upgrading packages on precise verifies of a bugfix
for an oneiric-to-precise dist-upgrade issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise:
After having install the version of update-manager from precise-proposed
I updated libreoffice, and a bunch of mono packages with no issue.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/update-manager
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Gnome and
falls
So I'm confused as to how this could have been fixed already in precise,
given that the changes in DistUpgradeViewGtk3.py to support this were
backed out as a result of the 1:0.156.14.5 security update. It's
possible that when Adam tested, he did so against the right (precise-
proposed) release-up
Hello Gema, or anyone else affected,
Accepted update-manager into precise-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-
manager/1:0.156.14.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
I am confused. This is listed as being fixed in 1:0.156.14.2 in precise-
proposed, but then the latest upload in the queue, 1:0.156.14.6, claims
to fix it again. Is that a type-o in the changelog or did the issue
actually not get fixed in the previous upload?
If its a type-o, then the upload needs
I can confirm that upgrading from 11.10 to 12.04 will auto expand
terminal dialog if upgrade idles in excess of 300s.
Thanks,
Adam
** Tags added: verification-done
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification becaus
This is fixed in quantal, but there doesn't seem to have been a
changelog ref for it.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
This happened to a friend this morning. Luckily I was able to point the
issue out to him. I'm sure this was fixed at one point and has regressed
again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/update-manager/precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Gnome and
falls
There is no mechanism for libc to do this, and I doubt we'd be
interested in adding such a thing to debconf; it's in too generic a
position to be able to have any remote idea whether a timeout is safe.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** Description changed:
+ TEST CASE:
+ - there is no trivial way to reproduce this as it only happens if in the
middle of the upgrade libgtk2-perl becomes unavailable
+ - a regression test is sufficient
+
+ Regression Potential:
+ - low, the worst that can happen is that the terminal gets expan
Hi
Would an alternate solution be to timeout the dialog after a long wait
( >300s), and for libc to either restart the service or ignore the
dialog ?
-- ritz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
** Tags removed: rls-mgr-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Gnome and
falls back to Dialog
To manag
08:56 < mvo> * fix automatic expand of the terminal if no activity happened
for >300s (LP: #993190)
08:56 < mvo> this one?
08:56 < slangasek> mvo: yes
08:56 < mvo> this needs reupload to proposed
08:56 < mvo> its in the precise branch of u-m
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Precise)
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Precise)
Milestone: None => precise-updates
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu Quantal)
Milestone: precise-updates => ubuntu-12.10
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: update-manager (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: High
Assignee: Canonical Foundations Team (canonical-foundations)
Status: Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification becau
Here is a screen capture of the blocking Debconf dialog that appears during the
upgrade on an amd64 system (I have upgraded 2 computers so far and have not
seen that on the i386 one): this is during the libc upgrade.
At that moment the glibc does not seem to be available (I have not been able to
Note that the terminal window may also not be visible due to bug #663457
(screen captures attached).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf: unable t
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:07:13PM -, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I quite agree, and I understand there's meant to be code already here
> to do that, which seems to be failing.
The current code for this in update-manager checks if DEBIAN_FRONTEND is
set to "gnome" without libgtk2-perl installed at
thanks steve, i have never tried repoting a bug before...hope my
explanation was sufficient and helps some others. i have seen a few
threads in the forums which sounded like those who encountered this same
"freezing" episode eventually gave up, and pressed the power button
to restartleavin
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:48:18PM -, jackel wrote:
> i'd like to know if what i experienced on 3 different updates in the
> last 2 days, is this bug or if something else needs to be reported?
Yes, this is exactly the same bug.
> ...i think the update should open the terminal window automati
i'd like to know if what i experienced on 3 different updates in the
last 2 days, is this bug or if something else needs to be reported?
i suck explaining things in detail, but will give it my best shot:
all 3 upgrades appeared to freeze at the point: "Preparing libc6". in
the bottom of the up
Hi Tim, thanks for reporting. Your problem is caused a package failing
to configure, either libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 or one of its dependencies.
Perhaps your issue is related, perhaps not. You could open a new bug
report for this (and provide the full log, because this is not enough to
analyse it fully).
I'm not sure whether it's related, but my install process - which
exhibited the errors above - culminated in this:
dpkg: error processing libgtk2.0-0 (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of librsvg2-common:
librsvg2-common dep
** Tags added: rls-p-tracking
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => precise-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf:
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title
Oh, false alarm, sorry. debconf fails to configure libc6:amd64 due to
this bug, and *that's* what causes libnih1 to fail.
/me -> bed
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
We've established on IRC that it isn't bug 850264 after all; but there
is definitely an apt bug here, albeit possibly one fixed in precise that
needs to be backported to oneiric. It wouldn't entirely surprise me if
this had been fixed by the giant unpack/configure ordering
rearrangement.
** Also
I believe that this may be specific to amd64 at this point in time. The
problem is that libpango1.0-0 is upgraded quite early, and it Depends:
libc6 (>= 2.14) on amd64 (but only >= 2.4 on other architectures). When
libpango1.0-0 has been unpacked, 'use Gtk2;' fails:
Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/au
And indeed you do have libgtk2-perl installed, so the above code is
actually irrelevant. It should have just worked ...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precis
debconf will automatically fall back from the Gnome frontend to Dialog,
then Readline, then Teletype, then Noninteractive, depending on which
one appears to be usable first. The problem is that update-manager
creates a VTE terminal to run things in for logging purposes, which does
a good enough jo
** Tags added: rls-mgr-p-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to precise: debconf: unable to initialize frontend: Gnome and
falls back to Dialog
To manage
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Foundations Team
(canonical-foundations)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979661
Title:
oneiric to preci
>From the beginning of term.log:
Use of uninitialized value $template in exists at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/Template.pm line 81, chunk 1.
Use of uninitialized value $item in exists at
/usr/share/perl5/Debconf/DbDriver/Cache.pm line 39, chunk 1.
Use of uninitialized value $item in exists at
/us
37 matches
Mail list logo
