[Bug 981402] Re: compiz crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()

2012-04-28 Thread Sepero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964316 Another Test! I ran this script on my system while actively using it (doing other things/browsing) #!/usr/bin/env bash while true; do partprobe /dev/sda sleep 5 done Perhaps someone else could test

[Bug 981402] Re: compiz crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()

2012-04-24 Thread Sepero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964316 I would have replied sooner, but I've been having health problems. Moving on... When I did not run my script for 4 days, compiz did not lockup in an infinite loop. Last night I ran a part of my script

[Bug 981402] Re: compiz crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()

2012-04-15 Thread Sepero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964316 Last night I let my computer run without my partitioning script running, and this morning compiz did not crash or freeze. I'm going to do the same again tonight and see if the results are the consistent. If

[Bug 981402] Re: compiz crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()

2012-04-14 Thread Apport retracing service
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964316 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #964316, so is being marked as such.

[Bug 981402] Re: compiz crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()

2012-04-14 Thread Sepero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 964316 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964316 Remember, this bug report is a duplicate of a private bug. Comment here only if you think the duplicate status is wrong. How am I supposed to know if the duplicate status is wrong if I'm unable to view the