Fredde's workaround does the trick. Thank you :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
Title:
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
I found the following solution
In fstab, this line couldn't unmount producing the "umount: mount disagrees
with the fstab" error:
sshfs#fredde@host:/dir/ /media/sshfs/mountpoint fuse user,noauto,idmap=user 0 0
Adding the option "fsname=sshfs#user@host:/dir/" did the trick:
sshfs#fredde@host:/dir
It is now almost six years later since the original bug report (#71609)
was filed, and Precise still has this bug (sshfs). The workaround
described in post #22 (which I believe stems from here:
http://www.unicom.com/blog/entry/651) may work for umount, but it breaks
pubkey authentication on mount (
Have this bug on current natty
mounting cifs share with suid'ed mount.cifs is successful, but unmount has...
disagreements.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
Title:
umount: mount
Comment #22 worked for me on my 10.04.2 fully updated. Adding the
trailing slash like the last comment did not work. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
Title:
umount: mount
Note that the problem with fuse sshfs should be fixed by util-linux-2.19
(for more detail see the fstab.5 man page and a note about "subtype").
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
Titl
I had this same issue with a CIFS mount. An easy solution/workaround can be
found here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cifs-utils/+bug/661025/comments/4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
Bug still here, samba 3.5.4 updates applied this morning
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
Ubuntu 10.10 32 bit.
Same here when mounting/unmounting cifs:
u...@ubuntu10-lap:~$ mount /media/test
u...@ubuntu10-lap:~$ mount
.
.
//xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/myfolder/ on /media/test type cifs
(rw,mand,nosuid,nodev,user=X)
u...@ubuntu10-lap:~$ umount /media/test
umount: /media/test mount disagrees
I can confirm this bug in 10.10. Changing back the status to "Confirmed" since
the fix for this bug was never released in the official distribution, although
a patch exists.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification becau
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
I'm experiencing the same as hcmeyr, Ubuntu 10.10 latest packages installed.
mounting a cifs share present in fstab works with "mount mountpoint" but
"umount mountpoint" fails with a "mount disagrees with the fstab". "sudo umount
mountpoint" works as expected
--
umount: mount disagrees with the
sorry too fast there, didnt mean to post the real line :O how can i
remove that?
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Robin van Leeuwen: i solved the issue with sshfs mounts like this:
first, create a symlink:
ln -s mount.fuse /sbin/mount.fuse.sshfs
then change the /etc/fstab syntax like this:
m...@styggve.dyndns.org:/media /media/media-server fuse.sshfs
user,idmap=user,allow_other,port=62000 0 0
u...
I am getting this bug in Meerkat on a samba share. sudo umount works,
the fstab line for the share has options noauto, users. All updates thru
July 15, 2010 applied.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are
Offcourse i meant all updates on july 10th 2010 (07-10-2010)
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Ok i have Lucid 10.04 and when i mount a sshfs through fstab:
---
sshfs#u...@server.com:/home/user/home/user/remotedisk fuse
users,exec,uid=1000,gid=1000,allow_other,reconnect,follow_symlinks 0 0
---
it mounts ok,
but when i want to umount i get :
---
umount: /home/user/
Hi Scott,
thanks for the remarks. I have nominated the bug fix for Jaunty, but
really I don't understand something. Can you please help me understand
it?
Bug #99437 reported by cseg on 2007-03-31. This bug was noticed in a
release much earlier then Ubuntu 9.04, which ""Jaunty Jackalope" is the
We do not ordinarily backport fixes to older releases - however, if you
wish to request that - click "Target to release" - do not change the
status of the bug for the _development_ release
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
umount: mount disagrees with the f
Another this about the bug, in fstab the entry does not have to be
represented with UUID. It can be any value, and it still doesn't unmount
as normal user.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Hi,
This bug affects Ubuntu 9.04, and should be fixed through official
repositories. A fix should be released by the maintainers, and it should
come as update.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.
Definitely present in 9.04, as late as 2.6.30-rc7-candela
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
I am seeing this bug again in Ubuntu 9.04, is this bug still around? Do
I need to apply a patch even to such a modern release?
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
I am seeing this bug again in Ubuntu server 8.04.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
h
Yepp, this has fixed the problem for me, and yes - I still get those two error
messages ('cannot eject the volume [LABEL]' and another one.
Hope this fix will be included in future updates.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug not
Frederick: You're right, cheers.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://list
Chris: The message "Cannot eject volume." is a separate issue and will
not effect usage in any way. I take it you are using Nautilus to
"eject" the volume. Nautilus eject does other things besides running
umount on the device. Nautilus is using gvm and hence hal for various
reasons. The proble
I have applied your patch Frederick and it does let users umount a drive
specified in fstab by UUID (thanks), however it still throws up an error saying:
"Cannot eject volume"
But it *does* indeed unmount, for which I'm grateful :) Just wanted to
let you know.
-c
--
umount: mount disagrees wit
Frederick: you are also correct. I could find my way into this, but I'm
thinking about regular users, those who wouldn't understand this or
simply prefer not to mess with such "complicated" things as fstab...
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You rece
Júlio: Thats true you may not want your mom to do that. In that case
the simple way is since you have sudo just make a fstab entry for the
drive using uuid and do not put in the user, users or group options.
Then you can mount it using sudo and it can not be mounted by a standard
user. The other
I will change this to Fix Released, even though I didn't test it myself.
If this wasn't the correct way to do it, please, let me know. Thanks.
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994
That's great, even though I'm not technical enough to understand what
the patch actually did. However, I was wondering: it is ok to allow
unprivileged users to mount/umount removable devices, but what about
fixed devices? Wouldn't it be better if general users be able to
mount/umount fixed drives o
All three bugs on this are from the same source. This is the fix. I am
attaching this patch to all three. I have been using it for a while,
its fine. The attached patch should be applied to the src-dep of util-
linux. For those of you who want this fix now follow these
instructions:
Modify you
Marked https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-volume-
manager/+bug/104693">this bug as duplicate of this one.
--
umount: mount disagrees with the fstab
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99437
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
I can confirm this bug. Fresh install of Feisty Fawn, it worked the
other day, but now it isnt working anymore, even with a reboot. Im not
root, but Im running as the first user created after install.
Im trying to umount my 2nd IDE hd (/dev/hdd1), and in Gnome, an error message
says:
umount: /me
35 matches
Mail list logo
