Oh, that? Sorry, I've long since moved to CentOS. Must check out Ubuntu
again soon and see if they are really serious about enterprise servers. But
I confess that I still love the Ubuntu Desktop :-)
On 11 June 2010 14:19, Chuck Short wrote:
> I dont see a reason to keep this open. Its not going
Okay friends,
Let's start off this week on a constructive note.
I have now whittled down my "VAST NUMBER OF VERY SERIOUS BUGS" to a list of
bare essentials which, if backported to Ubuntu 6.06 Server Edition LTS/Samba
3.0.22, will fulfill my requirements for implementing a workable Microsoft SBS
2:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Bug 137656] Re: Samba Backport Urgently Needed
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:35:52AM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
> > Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this
> stuff, but
> > try not to be so precious. I am j
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:35:52AM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
> Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this stuff, but
> try not to be so precious. I am just a humble infrastructure guy
> trying to make things *actually work*. My lack of expertise regarding
> what goes on in your do
Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this stuff, but try not
to be so precious.
I am just a humble infrastructure guy trying to make things *actually work*. My
lack of expertise regarding what goes on in your domain should not in any way
detract from my basic requirement that i
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:21:08AM -, jshanks wrote:
> (1) The security patches are backported
> (2) The bugfix patches are at least considered for backporting if they apply
> to the default "sane" configuration.
This is to a great extent what we do already.
> Any new functionality should
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:57:57PM -, jshanks wrote:
> [...] Samba has pretty much been treated as the redhead stepchild.
I'm not familiar with this idiom. I'm not a readhead nor a stepchild, so
I'm in no position to make assumptions about their care takers' attitude
towards them, but I gather
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:57:45PM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
> > What you are asking isn't security problem, but a wish for latest and
> > greatest. This will not happen in stable release. You could
> > come up with same question for every single package.
> Actually no, I'm *not* looking for the l
> What you are asking isn't security problem, but a wish for latest and
> greatest. This will not happen in stable release. You could
> come up with same question for every single package.
Actually no, I'm *not* looking for the latest and greatest, just something that
works.
My configuration is
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:35:24PM -, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Backports are handled through the release specific Backports projects on
> Launchpad.
Yes, but as I pointed out, a backport is not possible in this case, and
it may not even be appropriate.
affects ubuntu/samba
status confirmed
10 matches
Mail list logo
