* 2016-04-03 23:40 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
> That's not what the diff says. There is no change in ionice behavior in
> this patch. The patch removes --update from both branches of the if-
> statement.
Thanks for pinpointing that to me, fyo -- somehow I have mixed these
four lines (and --update +
* 2016-04-02 23:43 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
>> fyo, do you mean this statement:
>
>> > - do not modify the DB "in-place" with --update to avoid
>> > software-center seeing a corrupted database when it has
>> > it open at the same time
>
> Yes, that appears to be the argument for removing --update,
* 2016-03-31 10:12 GMT+03:00 fyo wrote:
>
> Agree or disagree, you can see the reason for the WONT FIX here:
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/wily/apt-xapian-index/wily/revision/22
fyo, do you mean this statement:
> - do not modify the DB "in-place" with --update to avoid
okay guys. they're not going to look at the case or do anything if you keep
adding to a bug that was marked as fixed.
you need to start a new bug.
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:59:08 +
From: siegert@gmail.com
To: ad...@hotmail.com
Subject: [Bug 363695] Re: update-apt-xapian-index uses
On 06/14/2011 05:13 PM, Robert Horswell wrote:
Just happened to me. CPU up to 100%, and then my laptop temperature
jumped to 96 degrees C, overheated, and shut itself off.
Reopen the bug. CPU overheating should is critical. Be sure to post your
details (Ubuntu version etc). You might use:
$
On 08/11/2010 09:00 PM, Rafael Gattringer wrote:
Regression?
From a new Maverick Alpha 3 install using '$ sudo
update-apt-xapian-index':
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+COMMAND
10244 root 20 0 124m 96m 10m R 95.2 26.1 1:26.92
update-apt-xapi
95.2% cpu - 26.1%
s2,
bash: alias: --portrait: not found
llh...@marcus:/$ sudo apt-get install apt-xapian-index
[sudo] password for llhull:
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
apt-xapian-index is already the newest version.
The following packages were
* 2010/5/12 lavinog lavi...@yahoo.com:
I don't think the space makes a difference:
Without the space:
ionice -p 3477
idle
Here you've left the space.
with the space:
ionice -p 3525
idle
The name of option which is said to have a difference is -c, not
-p. That surely may be bug in
* 2010/5/12 aexl wrote:
i dont understand the aim of the discussion.
I and lavinog were discussing whether is there a bug in ionice
parameter's parsing :)
when i do a patch then i dont rely on undocumented behaviour -
it might change anytime.
aexl, that's OK :) and thank you for you
Il giorno gio, 28/05/2009 alle 19.06 +, Pelládi Gábor ha scritto:
At least
can somebody tell me why we need this background process at all? Can I
uninstall it, without breaking functionality?
The program is described in apt-cache show as supporting the index of
packages that you see when
10 matches
Mail list logo
