All right, it seems the module I told you to install isn't compatible
with your kernel. It is suitable for linux 3.16. Something changed
between 3.16 and 3.19. Sorry.
I'll try to build a module for your kernel later in the week end. Please
send me a mail if I forget.
Cheers
Le 05/09/2015 11:0
That seems to work for me with linux kernel 4.1 and 4.2 rc6 ! Thank you
very much !
Dmitry, pushing your patch (i.e. reverting the revert) seems safe for
me, however we should make sure that this version of the firmware will
be distributed, not the other one, if ever, and that this new version
The problem is that we cannot control when the firmware is added. And
it is hard to track it. It is not added because of legal reasons.
There is no a driver package with the firmware in an acceptable format
with a distribution license. I think that it should be reverted either
way.
But the maintain
All right, so if this file isn't added to a package like linux-firmware
or linux-firmware-non-free, this seems to ok (and even better) to let
the fix reach users by upgrade. This will simplify the situation to any
user who don't have the problem I have.
I didn't remember that I added this firmw
It means that common Ubuntu users will not have problems if they
manually do not install that firmware.
2015-08-11 23:43 GMT+03:00 Raphaël Jakse :
> If I remove the firmware, my system boots correctly and I get :
>
> [ 16.210927] Bluetooth: Patch file not found ar3k/AthrBT_0x11020100.dfu
> [ 1
If I remove the firmware, my system boots correctly and I get :
[ 16.210927] Bluetooth: Patch file not found ar3k/AthrBT_0x11020100.dfu
[ 16.210930] Bluetooth: Loading patch file failed
Le 11/08/2015 21:28, Pilot6 a écrit :
> Raphael,
>
> Can you remove the firmware file? Do you still have p
Just tested mainline 4.2 rc6, still affected by the same problem.
Thank you very much for your help, and thank you for your decision to
report this fix.
--
Raphaël Jakse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
I'm about to send a launchpad bug against linux-image-3.19.0-26-generic
describing the bug, attaching the mail I sent to the maintainer. Should
I, even though the patch is going to be reverted?
Should I send a new mail to the maintainers?
Le 11/08/2015 00:28, Pilot6 a écrit :
> I agree. It is w
I agree. It is weird that upstream they did not notice the report.
I hope that they will notice it now, because I am the patch author.
I will send revert patches.
2015-08-11 1:15 GMT+03:00 Brad Figg :
> @Pilot6
>
> I believe this may be hurting more people than it is helping. The
> correct action
I agree. Maybe it makes sense to remove this patch, until the issue is
sorted out.
I can add a dkms module to ppa for those who are not affected.
@Brad What do you think?
2015-08-11 0:43 GMT+03:00 Raphaël Jakse :
> The patch in my opinion is a regression for some specific laptops like
> mine. We
The patch in my opinion is a regression for some specific laptops like
mine. We go from "everything works except Bluetooth" to "The system
works badly, and Bluetooth still doesn't work".
Someone who doesn't know the bug can't even guess easily this is caused
by the Bluetooth driver (if (s)he ev
I commented on the duplicate because I think the situation is a bit
different.
This patch simply fixes #1394368, that is, for many people who have the
0x04ca:0x300d device.
However, the same patch makes the same device enter a disconnect /
reconnect infinite loop in my specific laptop model (Ac
This patch makes Ubuntu unstable on my computer. I commented on bug
#1397885 to describe the situation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394368
Title:
Bluetooth with AR9462 doesn't wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
