Re: [Bug 195540] Re: Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1

2008-02-26 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are the changes you introduce from Upstream? If not, it might be worth forwarding them upstream first to get input for them. I am upstream. I didn't prepare a new upstream version because a. hardy version freeze b. it would have new

Re: [Bug 195540] Re: Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1

2008-02-26 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It'd be nice if you could adhere to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField (update-maintainer of the ubuntu-dev-tools package should do it automatically for you). If you want, sure, but as I am also the Debian maintainer, I

Re: [Bug 195540] Re: Candidate revision gscan2pdf_0.9.21-1ubuntu1

2008-02-26 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On 26/02/2008, Daniel Holbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please still change the Maintainer field - I know that in your case it's Revised debdiff attached. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Contributing already mentions (LP: #123456) but maybe it should be more prominent. :-) The closest I can