Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-13 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:28AM -, Alexander Sack wrote: > > please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 > patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 > patch does) > > > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-Januar

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-02 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:20AM -, Ban wrote: > Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > > > > i don't agree. it's true th

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-02-19 Thread Ban
Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the usbstorage device na

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-02-09 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:40:17PM -, Ban wrote: > i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like > interesting results: > it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, > only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, > the

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:57PM -, Ban wrote: > I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 > has) > > these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) > > do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that > the same one

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:49:20PM -, Ban wrote: > i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option > Icon 225 (GIO225) > > I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for > this device, that works great. > i can use the connection in networkm

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-18 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:46:58AM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Medium > Leann, this sounds like rather a simple fix. Can you ensure that this gets done during this cycle so users with that hardware dont get a wrong driver? - Alexan