[Bug 796634] Re: when entering a command, Terminal is asking for a password.

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 796290] Re: package python2.6-minimal (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 796288] Re: package update-manager 1:0.87.31 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): installArchives() failed

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 770853] Re: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

Thanks! Can you please report this to upstream or Debian as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770853 Title: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GC

[Bug 767092] Re: Grub gives graphics card invalid data

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/767092 Title: Grub gives graphics card invalid data To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 797718] [NEW] sun java 6u26 needs packaging

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** You have been subscribed to a public security bug by Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur): I am responsible for several ubuntu server machines running web services based on java. Maybe I misunderstand the update policy for security relevant fixes butI wonder w

[Bug 765230] Re: long sleep in boot process

LP: #802464 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765230 Title: long sleep in boot process To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug

[Bug 735897] Re: Add apport hooks to Banshee

This bug was fixed in the package banshee - 2.1.0-1ubuntu4 --- banshee (2.1.0-1ubuntu4) oneiric; urgency=low * Add apport hook (LP: #735897) -- Jeremy BichaWed, 06 Jul 2011 15:39:15 +0200 ** Changed in: banshee (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You rec

[Bug 806499] [NEW] xz will right over readonly files

Public bug reported: running xz --decompress (unxz) on a readonly file will not show any warning before writing over the file and changing the extension. This is technically expected behaviour but not sympathetic to the end user. ** Affects: xz-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 806499] Re: xz will right over readonly files

** Description changed: running xz --decompress (unxz) on a readonly file will not show any warning before writing over the file and changing the extension. This is technically expected behaviour but not sympathetic to the end user. - - ProblemType: Bug - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 -

[Bug 806191] Re: empathy-auth-client crashed with SIGSEGV in g_return_if_fail_warning()

talked to fabio he's going to get a valgrind log for the issue, leaving this as incomplete for now. ** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 805754] Re: Ubuntu Live freezes at boot.

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 713867 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713867 Massimo, I have just remembered that this also happened with some older releases of Ubuntu, I can't remember exactly what release (Lucid or Karmic) but I'm definetly sure that it hanged. As a matter of fact th

[Bug 802558] Re: [xorg-edgers] huge performance regression after upgrade

Thanks for the info. I'll stick with the 3.0 kernel (rc6 now) and intel git20110624 for the moment, unless i find a better combination of kernel/drivers versions. As for virtualbox, make sure you have installed the latest version of module-init-tools (cf. my previous link). I also had to execute

[Bug 797679] Re: package phpmyadmin (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 128

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797661] Re: package wine1.2 1.2.2-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797658] Re: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/drivers/base/core.c:124 device_release 0x6a/0x70()

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797629] Re: package firmware-b43-installer 4.150.10.5-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797452] Re: I cannot udpate anything in 'update manager' 10.04.2

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797356] Re: dchp server does not support HMAC-SHA256

** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797356 Title: dchp server does not support HMAC-SHA256 T

[Bug 797284] Re: package libpam-runtime 1.1.2-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797262] Re: Segfault causes sparodic logoffs after update to natty

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 796883]

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team

[Bug 800494] [NEW] your op system ubuntu11.04 is being attacter euer time it tured on

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** You have been subscribed to a public security bug by Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur): your op system ubntu11.04 is being atacked ever time i turn on. microsoft is break aii the rules if i where you i would check in to it asap>>> ** Affects: ubuntu-

[Bug 801302] [NEW] Java 6 update 26 not available for 10.04 LTS

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** You have been subscribed to a public security bug by Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur): All versions of Sun Java 6 before update 26 have serious security vulnerabilities. For details, see here: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujune2

[Bug 806447] Re: SWF insertion on Impress fails

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 805853 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805853 Hello, I've searched the Libreoffice documentation (http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/documentation/) about media installation on Ubuntu. "In Linux-based systems such as Ubuntu, media do not work straigh

[Bug 805459] Re: Compiz crashes frequently after it starts to slow down - on NVidia

gotcha Walter, thank you :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/805459 Title: Compiz crashes frequently after it starts to slow down - on NVidia To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 799975] Re: : Value 1804376064 out of range for Int32

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 800271] Re: /var/log/syslog and /var/log/partman

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799973] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.0-11ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799575] Re: Kubuntu crashes on logout after compiz installation

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799571] Re: package grub-pc 1.99~rc1-13ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799570] Re: package grub-pc 1.99~rc1-13ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799349] Re: package gforge-db-postgresql 5.0.2-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 255

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799155] Re: package firmware-b43-installer 4.150.10.5-5 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 799131] Re: flashplugin-nonfree has memory leak

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 798048] Re: gnome-user-share crashed with SIGABRT in g_option_context_parse()

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797967] Re: it can not install software: authentify process fail

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797885] Re: package cups 1.4.6-5ubuntu1.2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797766] Re: : E:Method has died unexpectedly!, E:Sub-process returned an error code (100), E:Method /usr/lib/apt/methods/ did not start correctly

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 797718] Re: sun java 6u26 needs packaging

** Visibility changed to: Public ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Thomason (brian-thomason) -- You received this bug noti

[Bug 797713] Re: I only have 13 gb, but on windows i have 255 gb.

Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker. Please visit https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+addquestion ** Visibility changed t

[Bug 770853] Re: gtk-led-askpass version 0.10-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

This bug was fixed in the package gtk-led-askpass - 0.10-2ubuntu2 --- gtk-led-askpass (0.10-2ubuntu2) oneiric; urgency=low * Makefile: Changed order of linker parameters, to avoid build problems in Oneiric with GCC-4.6 (LP: #770853) -- Sebastian CarneiroWed, 06 Jul 2011 16:

[Bug 770743] Re: pacemaker-mgmt version 2.0.0+hg1141-2ubuntu1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

** Changed in: pacemaker-mgmt (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) ** Changed in: heartbeat (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andres Rodriguez (andreserl) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 760632] Re: Resizing Konsole crashes the whole system

@Vlada: yes, I have tried both. I have tried the binary directly from nvidia site, not from the repository. Check here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606 I was not able to use the nouveau driver due to some kind of libdrm incompatibility... -- You received this bug notifica

[Bug 806503] Re: aptd crashed with SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 799982 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799982 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806503 Title: aptd crashed w

[Bug 806428] Re: Missing detailed package selection step in Oneiric

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/edubuntu-live -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806428 Title: Missing detailed package selection step in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 803171] Re: apng2gif version 1.1-1 failed to build on i386

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/apng2gif -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/803171 Title: apng2gif version 1.1-1 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https:/

[Bug 801302] Re: Java 6 update 26 not available for 10.04 LTS

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 797718 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797718 ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 797718 sun java 6u26 needs packaging -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 800793] Re: Opodo website is resized small

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 800579] Re: package libdca0 0.0.5-3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 800494] Re: your op system ubuntu11.04 is being attacter euer time it tured on

Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it. Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For help see https://wiki.ubuntu.

[Bug 799238] Re: Xubuntu i386 and amd64 20110618 xserver abort

I can confirm this bug on Xubuntu i386 ** Summary changed: - Xubuntu amd64 20110618 xserver abort + Xubuntu i386 and amd64 20110618 xserver abort -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799238

[Bug 772612] Re: maximized window is displaced

I'm using classic, not unity, and the bug is present, so I guess it's not related to unity itself. You can notice very well if you have the window close/minimize buttons on the right you miss them almost always then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 756040] Re: xless version 1.7-14 failed to build on i386

** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/xless -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756040 Title: xless version 1.7-14 failed to build on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 754532] Re: Launcher and Dash drawing behind windows after Xephyr opens full-screen

I'm having the same issue as Stan, but with any windows (I'm not using Xephyr or Firefox). In my case it might be caused by some setting I changed in my Compiz config. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 13319] Re: nautilus should sort by extensions

Oh yes, I should also have stated that I did try searching for *.ext but the search failed to function. Perhaps linux uses a different symbol to indicate "all". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 806505] [NEW] kubuntu upgrade to 11.04 produces error: cannot open theme file /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/themes/ethais

Public bug reported: kubuntu upgrade to 11.04 produces error: cannot open theme file /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdm/themes/ethais and then goes to command prompt, no kde desktop access, no gnome fall back or other desktop options @ login. It upgraded successfully (no reported issues) then upon reboot @

[Bug 806503] Re: aptd crashed with SystemError: E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 799982 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/799982 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #799982, so is being marked as such. Please loo

[Bug 801616] Re: Form history sometimes remembers credit card details

** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801616 Title: Form history sometimes remembers credit car

[Bug 801329] Re: Needs an Option for "install ALL updates"

** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/801329 Title: Needs an Option for "install ALL updates"

[Bug 771137] Re: lua-svn version 0.4.0-2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric

the no-add-needed failure can't be reproduced anymore. Instead there is a random testsuite failure ** Description changed: - lua-svn version 0.4.0-2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric - Link to failed build: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20110413/+buildjob/2461313

[Bug 803720] [NEW] nginx packages in hardy/hardy-backports allow null-byte vulnerability in certain configurations

*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** You have been subscribed to a public security bug by Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur): This is related to LP #783508. After more investigation, I've concluded that the issue identified in #783508 affects nginx 0.5, 0.6, 0.7 < 0.7.66, and 0.8 < 0.8.38. The

[Bug 803608] Re: package plymouth-theme-kubuntu-logo 1:11.04ubuntu14 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 2 zurück

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 803651] Re: Trava com frequencia

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 802342] Re: crashes duing game play and is really slow

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 802291] Re: package grub-pc 1.99~rc1-13ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 802274] Re: Security issue in kwalletcli_getpin(1): tty I/O now properly disables echoing input when asking for a passphrase is not fixed

** Changed in: kwalletcli (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: kwalletcli (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802274 Title: Sec

[Bug 802132] Re: : E:Method has died unexpectedly!, E:Sub-process returned an error code (100), E:Method /usr/lib/apt/methods/ did not start correctly

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 793796] Re: 2.6.38-10 panic after ejecting drive

@steubens: ok, by the trace r4 kernel really fixed the problem of previous trace (thanks for the pictures, they were valuable to check), but you hit another crash. I made another additional fix, please test the kernel I uploaded at http://people.canonical.com/~herton/lp793796/r5/ -- You received

Re: [Bug 789488] Re: crashed tar file when upgrading to 11.04

Hello, i have backuped my data and installed clean OS. LV Dne 5.7.2011 08:13, RedSingularity napsal(a): > Did that help by any chance? > --- > Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager > http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

Re: [Bug 494447] Re: ModemManager seizes ttyS0, preventing use by other apps

On 11-07-06 04:55 AM, Aleksander Morgado wrote: > Since some time ago, ttyS0 shouldn't be used by ModemManager unless > specifically tagged in udev. So this bug is probably no longer valid. > > ** Changed in: modemmanager (Ubuntu) > Status: New => Fix Released > Correct. -- ** Attachmen

[Bug 806507] Re: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b22-1.10.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2

-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806507 Title: package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b22-1.10.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit s

[Bug 806507] [NEW] package openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b22-1.10.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2

Public bug reported: Using automatic update feature in ubuntu ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: openjdk-6-jre-headless 6b22-1.10.1-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 6 15:1

[Bug 804785] Re: HNH

Thank you for using Ubuntu and taking the time to report a bug. Your report should contain, at a minimum, the following information so we can better find the source of the bug and work to resolve it. Submitting the bug about the proper source package is essential. For help see https://wiki.ubuntu.

[Bug 804779] Re: package libpam0g 1.1.2-2ubuntu8.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804776] Re: package vdr 1.6.0-9ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804656] Re: Computer freezes games on facebook are not running right

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804540] Re: package initramfs-tools 0.98.8ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804528] Re: package linux-image-3.0-2-generic 3.0-2.3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804417] Re: facebook is not opening in firefox

Thanks for your comments. This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but it would make more sense to raise your question in the support tracker. Please visit https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+addquestion ** Visibility changed t

[Bug 804251] Re: Problem with video/audio

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804208] Re: package linux-image-2.6.38-10-generic 2.6.38-10.44 failed to install/upgrade: lecture courte (short read) lors d'une copie de buffer pour backend dpkg-deb pendant « ./boot/vmlinuz-2.6

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804172] Re: package gir1.2-dbusmenu-glib-0.4 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: gagal mengakses arsip: Tidak ada berkas atau direktori seperti itu

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 804136] Re: failed to fetch relsease.gpg during upgrade to 11.04 from 10.10

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 803720] Re: nginx packages in hardy/hardy-backports allow null-byte vulnerability in certain configurations

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since the package referred to in this bug is in universe or multiverse, it is community maintained. If you are able, I suggest posting a debdiff for this issue. When a debdiff is available, members of the security team

[Bug 765230] Re: long sleep in boot process

No delay now: Jul 6 10:24:08 lakshmi kernel: [1.494740] pci :00:01.0: MSI quirk detected; subordinate MSI disabled Jul 6 10:24:08 lakshmi kernel: [2.350204] pci :01:05.0: Boot video device $ uname -a Linux lakshmi 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 15:07:17 UTC 2011 x

[Bug 806512] [NEW] package doc-base 0.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Public bug reported: well installing the package and got this . ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: doc-base 0.10.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0-3.4-generic-pae 3.0.0-rc5 Uname: Linux 3.0-3-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jul 6 10:05:56 2011 ErrorMessage:

[Bug 806512] Re: package doc-base 0.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806512 Title: package doc-base 0.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2 To manage

[Bug 806490] Re: need help

Hi, Since you are asking a question and haven't reported any sort of issue that could be interpreted as a bug I am converting this bug to a question so it can be dealt with as one. Thanks, --- Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad ** Changed in: qtcreator (Ubuntu)

[Bug 806397] Re: Thunderbird ghost stays in unity after uninstalling

Hi Pavol, Did you have Thunderbird installed before in Natty? Thanks, --- Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 806328] Re: Last update of flash plugin left my youtube videos broken (black screen)

Thank you for reporting this to Ubuntu. Please try reinstalling the flash player: sudo apt-get install --reinstall flashplugin-installer ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 806300] Re: Crash start Firefox

** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806300 Title: Crash start Firefox To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou

[Bug 806299] Re: monitor.py crashed with NoSectionError in items(): No section: 'General'

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 806076] Re: Minimal Setup progress bar at 100% while downloading

Looking at graphs of network usage by vmware, during the 15-minute pause after selecting the optional software, and the buggy progress bar, a download was commenced. This took 15 minutes, and I believe that a progress bar is needed during this download. -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 805888] Re: package xml-core 0.13 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 805843] Re: package shared-mime-info 0.71-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: installed post-installation script alfolyamat 134 hibakóddal kilépett

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 805606] Re: WidescapeWeatherScreenlet.py crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.7/screenlets/utils.py: No module named BeautifulSoup

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 805592] Re: package ttf-droid 1.00~b112 dfsg 1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 805453] Re: package texlive-binaries 2009-5ubuntu0.2 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privile

[Bug 805244] Re: Method "Create Collection" with signature "a{sv}" on interface "org.freedesktop.Secret.Service" doesn't exist

Can someone who is getting this issue, please install the following package, and let me know if it resolves the problem? Thanks. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntuone/+archive/nightlies/+files/ubuntu-sso- client_1.3.1%2Br732-24%7Eoneiric1_all.deb -- You received this bug notification because you are

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >