*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Public bug reported:
fehler bei der updateinstallation
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870481
Title:
package samba
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #870480, so is being marked as such. Please
Public bug reported:
fehler bei dem update installation
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess
** Changed in: elinks (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = 杨敏 (mandy9337)
** Visibility changed to: Private
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769354
Title:
elinks
Yes, /var/log/samba/log.nmbd is now empty.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850771
Title:
package samba
** Changed in: elinks (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = 杨敏 (mandy9337)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24792
Title:
elinks keystroke reading broken
To manage
@maxb, thanks for the bug report. Can you expand on the puzzling line
of output appears in the terminal, as I couldn't see this.
Perhaps if you are able to, proposing a patch would be really useful.
Thanks.
** Changed in: etckeeper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
** Changed in:
@smoser, this patch targets developers rather than consumers right?
That being the case, as the Ubuntu nova packages are releasing soon - is
this patch of more use in P-Series?
Ie, what is the impact if this doesn't land in Oneiric?
Thanks.
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Thanks for the bug report, please can you comment if something else was
running concurrently that was using dpkg?
It looks like another dpkg based process locked the db.
Thanks.
Setting up irqbalance (0.55+20091017-3ubuntu2) ...
debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked
It's not clear to me what package this bug affects:
Based on Log output:
Setting up p3scan (2:2.3.2-7ubuntu2) ...
chown: Zugriff auf „/var/run/p3scan“ nicht möglich: Datei oder Verzeichnis
nicht gefunden
dpkg: error processing p3scan (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script
** Changed in: elinks (Ubuntu)
Assignee: 杨敏 (mandy9337) = (unassigned)
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/769354
Title:
elinks
This is not an appropriate rule because it negates the property of guest
isolation. This should be handled dynamically by the security driver,
but it is not (which is the bug). This could be done in a couple of
ways. What are the contents of /var/log/libvirt/qemu/guest1.log after
the AppArmor
On the receiving host :
root@node1:~# cat /var/log/libvirt/qemu/guest1.log
LC_ALL=C PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/bin
QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=none /usr/bin/kvm -S -M pc-0.12 -enable-kvm -m 512 -smp 1 -name
guest1 -uuid 4aa60863-6b03-2f19-897f-4de6d12c96e1 -chardev
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870744
Title:
package samba-common 2:3.4.7~dfsg-1ubuntu3.8 failed to
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
Public bug reported:
I didn't actually notice the failed install. But connectivity went
away. I had to remove and re-install Samba from scratch to get it
working again. Note also that security=user seems to cause the Samba
server to be invisible to Windows 7 machines--by changing that one line
The puzzling line of output is something like:
root r...@mymachine.someplace.tld
which appears without any explanation in the output of an apt operation
when etckeeper is invoked.
A suitable patch would be to simply add /dev/null to the bzr whoami
invocation in 50vcs-commit.sh
--
You
Here is a deb of the smbk5pwd overlay, packed for 10.04 Lucid. It is a
patched version, which also updates the shadowLastChange attibute if
exists.
** Attachment added: slapd-smbk5pwd_lucid_i386.deb
** Also affects: kvm
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: kvm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
Just tested with the mainline 3.0.6-030006-generic kernel, still
panicking...
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.0.6-oneiric/linux-
image-3.0.6-030006-generic_3.0.6-030006.201110050043_amd64.deb
and ...
Just tested with the mainline 3.1.0-0301rc9-generic kernel, this kernel
after
Damn - 3.1.0-0301rc9-generic lasted *much* longer, but eventually ended
with another Oops...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870168
Title:
Kernel Oops - Oneiric
Public bug reported:
apt-get install cobbler...
add suggestions, try again, add more suggestions, repeat... ok now install
want bind 9 on the system but don't want it to startup( except manually)
bind9 is not configured, so unless it is a cahing name server, it should not be
set to start
bind9
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871058
Title:
package bind9 1:9.7.3.dfsg-1ubuntu2.2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned
I believe we saw this on an intel Emerald Ridge box w/ 40 cores recently
as well with the latest Oneiric while at the OpenStack summit. This is
actually one of Canonical's spare kernel build machines, and should be
directly available for testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870168
* Stopping domain name service... bind9 [168G resolvconf: Error:
/etc/resolv.conf must be a symlink
This is actually a problem with the way resolvconf handles bind9, not
bind9 directly.
** Package changed: bind9 (Ubuntu) = resolvconf (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
How do I get a backtrace if the problem appears if nothing happens or if
many applications have to be run for the crash report to appear?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/836399
Title:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Public bug reported:
fehler bei der updateinstallation
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870481
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870480 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #870480, so is being marked as such. Please
Public bug reported:
fehler bei dem update installation
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-34.77-generic 2.6.32.44+drm33.19
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870480
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.11~dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed
Public bug reported:
I'm getting crashes like this every few hours, on a system that was stable with
maverick.
Not yet sure why.
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.19
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4
Uname:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870483
Title:
6045] BUG: Bad page state in process make pfn:304b7
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 726394 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726394
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #726394, so is being marked as such. Please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 828038 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828038
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #828038, so is being marked as such. Please
Exactly the same thing happened on my other computer this morning. I
noticed that I wasn't prompted to reboot the computer after a new kernel
was installed, which I thought a bit odd. But when I started the
Software center the button turned red. I think this is another bug so
I'll start a new bug
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835531
Title:
Fn key not
Public bug reported:
I have experienced this bug on two different computers. I have noticed
that when a system restart is necessary the user isn't notified until
the software center is launched. This morning a new kernel was
installed, and I thought it strange that I wasn't prompted to restart
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870484
Title:
Update notifier doesn't properly prompt when restarts are necessary
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This is too late to fix in Oneiric, but I can look at it and fix it in
the next cycle.
** Changed in: language-pack-gnome-ru (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 818177 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818177
Kiall, I aggree. I'm duplication with bug #818177 because there I think
this report will get more attention, as that bug is already triaged. And
the messages of install failure are the same as in that bug.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870483
Title:
6045] BUG: Bad page state in process make pfn:304b7
To manage
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870488
Title:
Banshee.exe crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
This just happened to me with the latest set of packages for 11.10 beta.
I don't think it has been fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863633
Title:
compiz crashed with SIGABRT on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 839286 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/839286
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #839286, so is being marked as such. Please
** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713388
Title:
ugly warning message
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/706603
Title:
gem1.9.1 doens't install executables on PATH
To manage notifications
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 869109 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869109
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #869109, so is being marked as such. Please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 82 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/82
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #82, so is being marked as such. Please
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652481
was reported upstream.
** Changed in: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586087
Title:
Luid: floating point operations seems not to match
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870496
Title:
plasma-desktop crashed with SIGSEGV in __memmove_ssse3()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
I am using a newly installed LibreOffice Base package 3.3.4, under U11.04
I proceed with FileNewDatabaseLink to existing, then open the dbase type
list.
But among all options (JDBC, ADABAS, ODBC etc..) no MS-Access option is
displayed
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870493
Title:
connect wizard does not show the option to link to a MS.Access dbase
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The update this morning improved things but has not quite solved. I now
have sound input and output. But my voice is incomprehensible because it
is very fast.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/oneiric/udev/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818177
Title:
boot failures because 'udevadm exit' times out while udevd waits for
Weird. I haven't seen any oddities on my machine. So I can't reproduce.
Could you get a stack trace and should I reopen this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863633
Title:
compiz
I've uploaded a fix for this to oneiric-proposed already. It just needs
approving :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869311
Title:
searchplugins installation damaged after
I see this bug still in status new, but it seems to me that it has
been resolved for long...
** Changed in: hibernate (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870479
Title:
NetworkManager crashed with SIGSEGV in nm_dhcp_client_start_ip6()
To manage notifications about this
Yes it's correct, but it also happens if I try to create a USB stick from
oneiric-desktop-amd64.iso, same error,same message.
I'm attaching the .disk/info file from the debian-6.0.2.1-amd64-netinst.iso.
** Attachment added: disk-info
Yes it's correct, but it also happens if I try to create a USB stick from
oneiric-desktop-amd64.iso, same error,same message.
I'm attaching the .disk/info file from the debian-6.0.2.1-amd64-netinst.iso.
** Attachment added: disk-info
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870504
Title:
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
StacktraceTop:
brasero_drive_settings_get_mapping_flags (value=0x1, variant=0xf381d9,
user_data=0x9d22bf6) at brasero-drive-settings.c:113
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
?? ()
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: Stacktrace.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870504/+attachment/2526399/+files/Stacktrace.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870504
Title:
brasero crashed
** Attachment added: ThreadStacktrace.txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870504/+attachment/2526400/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Thank you for your report!
However, processing it in order to get sufficient information for the
developers failed (it does not generate an useful symbolic stack trace). This
might be caused by some outdated packages which were installed on your system
at the time of the report:
outdated debug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 863930 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863930
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #863930, so is being marked as such. Please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 726301 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726301
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #726301, so is being marked as such. Please
Solved for me with last update
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865567
Title:
ubuntuone-client-gnome needs to install gsettings schemas
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The root error is that in worker_new(), at lines 353 ff., the worker
threads process signals and udev event handling requests in the same
loop. If it happens that both the signal and the event are received
close enough together to be returned in the same epoll_wait(), and the
udev_monitor handle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 820601 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820601
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #820601, so is being marked as such. Please
on a fresh kubuntu 11.04 installation i mostly have exactly the same
symptoms as first poster except that after adding pci=nomsi to
/etc/default/grub my usb 3.0 disk is detected sometimes. Never directly
after boot if plugged in but every 3rd time or so if plugged in after
boot. Perhaps time out
It is getting worse and worse. After updating yesterday, I'm getting 3
crashes when I boot today, without doing any action!
The other two bugs are Bug #870509 and #870511
And while reporting the 3 bugs also firefox crashes...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 850005 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850005
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #850005, so is being marked as such. Please
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 861548 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/861548
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug #861548, so is being marked as such. Please
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/864813
Title:
gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/867565
Title:
gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860330
Title:
gnome-terminal crashed with SIGSEGV in g_object_notify()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Tried that; doesn't work because the master process already thinks the
event is dispatched as soon as it sends it, whether or not the worker
process acts on it with recvmsg(). So I guess we need to try to process
the event after all.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Bug is more than 2 years, old, confirmed, really annoying, probably
affecting much more people than those who took the time to report it,
probably easy checking and fixing, still undecided and unassigned.
So what ? Should we start torturing kitten until somebody puts a helping
hand on it ?
--
Can confirm, removing nautilus-open-terminal resolved the crashes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865115
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get(), if both nautilus-
pHey...brI had tried everything because of this im always one step
ahead ive finally reached the top keep this between us bra
href=http://www.national-fast-
cash.com/redirect.php?wewefamp;movyriv=aol.comamp;bifono=mail.comamp;url=http://businessnews20.net/esubmit/bizopp_hw2.php;http://www
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
Thank you for taking the time to file a bug report on this issue.
However, given the number of bugs that the Kernel Team receives during
any development cycle it is impossible for us to review them all.
Therefore, we occasionally resort to using automated bots to request
further testing. This is
1 - 100 of 1710 matches
Mail list logo
