[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-16 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: grpc (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935709 Title: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake To manage notifications

[Bug 2061911] [NEW] check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed

2024-04-16 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: During the noble merge and Jammy/Mantic MRE, a functional change was spotted for the root servers to be updated. This notice is at - https://b.root-servers.org/news/2023/05/16/new- addresses.html From the page:Our new IPv4 address will be 170.247.170.2 and our new IPv6

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Package is in proposed now. Testing in an LXC container shows a fix of this behavior. $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n $ lxc shell n # dpkg -s rsync | grep Version: Version: 3.2.7-1build2 # rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/os-release /tmp/ *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
There was an upstream commit[0] which looked promising. I tried applying that and the test still fails the same. The results are in my PPA[1]. [0] - https://github.com/symfony/polyfill/commit/1100c075b44595802401a0c9d6505bc1e8fd299a [1] -

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is probably an issue with building against php8.3. I see the debian version is building against php8.2 right now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049901 Title:

[Bug 2058417] Re: hibernation not working on m5.large instance first boot

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Just tested this again with ami-02cc3ff919a972d83 in us-east-1 and hibernation is working as intended upon first boot. I am closing this bug now, but will reopen if this issue comes back. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug

[Bug 2049901] Re: php-symfony-polyfill FTBFS on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This package looks like it'll take quite a bit more digging to get to build properly. Since this is a leaf package and in universe I'll stop working on this due to FF looming. I submitted a bug report to debian to give them a heads up that they may hit this when updating php to 8.3 as well[0].

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-22 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I attempted to reproduce this issue in a VM and wasn't succesful. I essentially copied the tgtbasedmpaths test but made the backing disk bcache cache before setting up the targets. 1) create vm $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble --vm n-vm $ lxc shell n-vm # apt install -y lsscsi multipath-tools

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Fundamentally my setup is different than the scenario set up in the bug. I was initially confused why multipathing was even happening, so I will explain the scenario here. In case someone else is also confused. The hardware is a JBOD enclosure where each disk has redundant I/O, hence the

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-23 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I have successfully created a kvm based reproducer. 1) get an image $ wget https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-live/pending/noble-live-server-amd64.iso 2) Create bcache disk $ fallocate -l 20G image.img $ make-bcache -C image.img 3) Boot into iso with multipathed bcache disk $ kvm

[Bug 2019881] Re: Dev package does not contain cmake files

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1935709 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935709 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1935709 grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This bug does specifically mention libgrpc++-dev, but I only see the cmake files added in libgrpc-dev in the debian archives, so I assume that's good enough to only include the cmake files in libgrpc-dev and not libgrpc++-dev. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2055296] Re: qemu: virtio: bogus descriptor or out of resources

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Still waiting for movement in https://gitlab.com/qemu- project/qemu/-/issues/2014 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues #2014 https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2014 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1971114] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 python3-grpcio causes some apps to use 100% of the CPU

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I wonder if just a newer version of grpcio makes it work as well. I upgraded grpcio to 1.44 from the Jammy 1.30, but it's not apples to oranges as I had python3-grpcio 1.30.2-3build6 installed via the archive, and upgraded to the one installed by pip. Looking past grpc, I was curious if building

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Only Jammy suffers from this, as Mantic+ contains the change to add the cmake files. This does look like it could be remedied with a single line change as alluded by Masanori in comment #4. The one line change is a partial of the debian commit when doing a libary transition[0]. I'm building a

[Bug 1971114] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 python3-grpcio causes some apps to use 100% of the CPU

2024-04-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This seems to still be an issue in Jammy. FWIW following[0] I installed a newer version of using ``` pip3 install --ignore-installed grpcio==1.44.0 ``` And now it seems to work fine. [0] - https://github.com/evilsocket/opensnitch/issues/647 -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2060826] Re: hxtools ftbfs in Noble

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Why was this changed to affect libhx? I don't see this failure in libhx. I believe this is a duplicate to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060825. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This looks like it could already be fixed in debian with https://salsa.debian.org/debian/rsync/-/commit/d3a0eccf989175b096c10b6c42b02b1ee1306a00 I'll try an ubuntu build with this patch and report back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
The debian patch looks promising in my local testing. I uploaded a test package to run dep8 tests against. If those look green I'll submit my MP and get it in ASAP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1313848] Re: AuthnProviderAlias does not work w/ authnz_ldap

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for the explanation kevin! I'm marking this issue as Won't Fix because Trusty is EOL. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rsync (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu Focal)

[Bug 1945774] Re: openssl: breaks ssl-cert installation: 8022CB35777F0000:error:1200007A:random number generator:RAND_write_file:Not a regular file:../crypto/rand/randfile.c:190:Filename=/dev/urandom

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is easy to reproduce in a jammy lxd container. $ lxc launch ubuntu:jammy j $ lxc shell j # sed -i 's#"$OUTFILE.key" 2>/dev/null#"$OUTFILE.key"#g' /usr/sbin/mellon_create_metadata # # mellon_create_metadata https://sp.10.5.100.3/mellon

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I was able to reproduce this in a noble LXD container. $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n $ lxc shell n # ssh-keygen -t rsa # cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys # touch testfile.txt # rsync -F --delete-after --archive /root/testfile.txt 127.0.0.1:/tmp/ The authenticity of host

[Bug 2060967] Re: noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Quickly testing Jammy/Mantic in a similar fashion as above I do not see the buffer overflow. ** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2061911] Re: check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045297 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045297 Thanks Sergio, looks like that does cover it :) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2045297 file root.hints needs update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2063400] Re: package unixodbc-common 2.3.9-5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/odbc.ini', which is also in package odbcinst 2.3.11-1

2024-04-26 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hello Yosua, Thank you for making this bug report! Where did you get the odbcinst 2.3.11-1 package? I do not see that in our archives for Jammy. ** Changed in: unixodbc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect when using /etc/nbdtab on Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble)

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client

[Bug 1887558] Re: Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device.

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Any objection to renaming this bug title to something more accurate such as "multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1887558] Re: multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot

2024-04-24 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Summary changed: - Multipath JBOD storage devices are not shown via /dev/mapper but each path as a single device. + multipathd bcache disks do not get picked up by multipath-tools during boot ** Description changed: - As in the title, if machine has multipath storage device connected e.g. -

[Bug 2043002] Re: merge from upstream for Noble

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Closing this, decided not do to the merge for an LTS. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043002 Title: merge

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect when using /etc/nbdtab on Ubuntu 24.04 (Noble)

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - NBD users who want to use /etc/nbdtab will face issues when trying to - start the NBD Client. Trying to use the `systemd` service also doesn't - work. + nbdtab uses a port of 0 by default which is not sensible. This means + that if you do not set a

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: [ Impact ] nbdtab uses a port of 0 by default which is not sensible. This means that if you do not set a default port in nbdtab, it will fail. You will see an error such as: Error: Socket failed: Connection refused - [ Test Plan ] $ lxc launch

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-04-25 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: nbd (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745

[Bug 2062084] Re: sessions should be nested with care warning

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is easy to reproduce the error message itself, and I think it's happening just because tmux is nested. I'm not sure why it's getting nested in your environment though. Do you have byobu to automatically start up when you login? How do you have that set up? $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:noble n

[Bug 2052610] Re: value too great for base error with locale fr_FR

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Egil, thanks for the update. The changes look reasonable enough to me, but unfortunately I don't think we will get them in immediately due to feature freeze just happening. It'd also be nice to get these changes in upstream so it's an official backport. In the meantime I built a byobu with the

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-04-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Marcus, Thanks for making this bug report! To answer your question[0] on why we have version 1.24 instead of 1.25, we stay up to date with debian for this package. Since debian is still on 1.24 that's what we have. I'm curious if you were able to test the patch and if it worked for you,

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/465301 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-04-30 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: - Hi, - we recorded more than 30% performance regression on Ubuntu Focal for AWS Graviton instances since Nginx package is not compiled with "-moutline-atomics" cflag for arm64 architecture (337548 rps with default package and 484453 rps using the proposed flag). + [

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-09 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi, just want to add a quick comment that I’m on vacation until the end of the week so don’t expect a reply from me until then. Also will be attending the Canonical sprint next week so might not be able to update this next week either. Feel free to take a stab at this if you are triaging this bug

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I was looking into bug #1998678 as a potential reason, do you see any concerning logs in your /var/log/exim4/mainlog (or wherever your logs are)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372

[Bug 2064486] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1.2build2 failed to install/upgrade: installed tftpd-hpa package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-05-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thank you for the response Nigel! > Looks like a false alarm Would you like to close this bug then? I'm also curious how often this issue occurs, maybe the maintainer script should be improved to check for port availability before attempting to start the unit. -- You received this bug

[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064457 Title: Merge rsync from Deb

[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Deb

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-01 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Description changed: This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu. This bug tracks an update to the following versions: - * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.12 - * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27 +  * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3 +  * Jammy

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-03 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Dominic, did you upgrade to mantic and start seeing this failure, or did you make a new mantic install and set things up from scratch? I wonder if some logic elsewhere was changed in Debian that we missed, or has this always been broken? This scenario would also be a nice thing to have a dep8

[Bug 2046489] Re: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support

2024-05-04 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046489 Title: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support To manage

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
ured. ++ Federation Plugin: + * Use vhost to delete federated exchange. + * Added new dep8 tests: + - d/t/smoke-test + - d/t/hello-world + - d/t/publish-subscribe + - d/t/rpc + - d/t/work-queue ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dz

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/465972 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE

[Bug 1986739] Re: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit`

2024-05-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I bumped the debian bug and made a MR for their consideration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986739 Title: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit` To manage

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-05-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
That could be a possibility. On a side note, I tried to setup a testbed to reproduce this (and start working on a dep8 test) and can't seem to get the setup working correctly. I followed the steps in bug #1998678, see the mail in `/var/mail/ubuntu` but don't see any Received-SPF headers at all,

[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I originally made this to get the fix in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 Oracular. Instead, that commit is being cherrypicked into Oracular. Keeping this open in-case nbd getes a new unstable release during Oracular. ** Description changed: Upstream: 3.26.1

[Bug 2065682] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2049775] Re: add BTRFS support

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This is being dropped for SRU reasons due to the feature not being useful for us at the moment, because the root filesystem can not be btrfs. If that changes in the future, then this will be revisited. Closing. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You

[Bug 2065682] Re: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2065683 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065683 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2065683 Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2065683] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: Triaged ** Changed

[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Title: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage

[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
ged in: nginx (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
1.26.0-1 is now available in Debian unstable. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Ti

[Bug 2064392] Re: Merge checksecurity from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Set to invalid due to no merge needed (we are up to date with Debian). ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal

2024-05-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server

[Bug 2065757] [NEW] Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: Ubuntu: 2.8.8-1ubuntu1 Debian: 3.2.1-4 ** Affects: networkx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757

[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Tried a quick merge and see: Missing build dependencies: python3-libpysal (>= 4.10), python3-momepy, python3-pydot (>= 2.0) So a few package updates are needed, and an addition of the new package python3-momepy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular

2024-05-15 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
python3-libpysal and python3-pydot are already in the process of syncing for oracular, and the new python3-momepy package is in proposed as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757

[Bug 2064451] Re: Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Right now there is nothing to do since we up to date with Debian. If we want to update it, we will need to either wait to see if Debian updates during OO development, or pull from upstream which does publish deb files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I haven't updated this for a bit, but I tried the aforementioned change in comment #7 in this PPA and it did not build - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp1935709-grpc-cmake-dev- files/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Lucas, that makes sense. I'll set this to invalid then :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage

[Bug 2064139] [NEW] not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: All architectures except amd64 are not building due to: debian/rules binary-arch dh binary-arch --buildsystem=golang --with=golang --builddirectory=_build dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=any -O../runc_1.1.12+ds1-2ubuntu1_arm64.buildinfo dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
It may be nice to remove the !amd64 builds since the build failures look like an issue, but maybe that's just me. ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I didn't see a bug to track the Oracular merge, so I made it here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client

[Bug 2064688] [NEW] Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: Upstream: 3.26.1 Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2 Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1 This merge is has the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 that will let noble out of proposed. ** Affects: nbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New --

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Andreas! Regarding comment #3 a) debian version has this fix, and quite a few updates to the debian/* directory, so I think we might as well do an early oracular merge to get that fix in. B) I'm curious why the excuses page didn't pick up those autopkgtests during the sync? -- You

[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-02 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Whoops, the fix is in debian experimental, we might need to wait for a new unstable release to happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688 Title: Merge nbd from Debian unstable

[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Please sync this. PPA - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2064457-rsync- oracular-merge (The build runs the autopkgtest) tested for the noble bug in an lxc container, which is the only ubuntu delta. Saw the issue is fixed. root@o:~# dpkg -s rsync | grep Version: Version:

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Andreas, the test_customize_compiler flag test has always failed. I'm curious about why it's failing but the autopkgtest as a whole is passing. In fact, the same failures occur for both jammy/focal since forever - yet they seem to be the reason w hy the Focal autopkgtest fails, whereas Jammy

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-07 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
i took a look at the other focal packages and put my thoughts. RELEASE=focal TRIGGER=python2.7/2.7.18-1~20.04.4 release arch packageversion exitcode triggersrequester --- --- -

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks a ton Mauricio! Would we be good to start phasing the Jammy package then while I investigate the Focal failures? I'll start taking a look at Focal today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Utkarsh! 902a13b2 Rely on newly un-broken dmsetup There was a patch in Debian[0] to handle a mismatched variable name, which was finally updated >= 2:1.02.196-1~, so the patch was removed and now multipath-tools relies on that version. Here we unfortunately have a slightly older version[1]

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Actually some of our changes[0] to try and enable socket based activation are still present. Let me do a little digging and confirm these changes are still good to have. I thought I recalled these changes being dropped. I think these changes are still fine to bring in, but let me do a little

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-06 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Yeah I confirmed with Sergio - some of the changes are still present, but it should not be harmful. Thankfully these changes are easy to test, and as long as the service is enabled and working at boot, and after a package installation it will be fine. I will manually test booting from a

[Bug 2026757] Re: dnsmasq on Ubuntu Jammy crashes on neutron-dhcp-agent updates

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I wonder if the latest update to Jammy has fixed the issue? Is this issue still occurring for you when upgrading to the Jammy package version 2.90-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 Julia? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks for making this bug report! This could be related to your other bug[0], but just in-case can you show how you are configuring exim4, and if you have simple steps to reproduce this issue, that would be helpful. [0] - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372 -- You

[Bug 1993081] Re: Installing samba-dev:i386 breaks Ubuntu 22.04.1.

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Officially closing as Won't Fix since i386 is not an officially supported arch, and it seems there is not any more desire for this. Please let me know if this should stay open. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix ** Changed in: python3.10 (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Hi Dominic, Thanks for taking the time to submit this bug report and make Ubuntu better! Where are you setting the variable CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true ? Doing a quick google search I found[0] which looks like it may be useful. It says to do the following - 1) Add `CHECK_RCPT_SPF = true` to the top

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-18 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks John. I'll leave this bug as is, feel free to add any tags/subscriptions to help track it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993837 Title: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too

[Bug 1992339] Re: package nginx-core 1.18.0-6ubuntu14.2: nginx: [emerg] dlopen() "/usr/share/nginx/modules/ngx_stream_geoip2_module.so" failed (/usr/share/nginx/modules/ngx_stream_geoip2_module.so: un

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm going through some old bugs. I'm also unable to reproduce this. If we could get some more information such as what your /etc/nginx/nginx.conf looks like, that may be helpful in reproduction. Looking online I see a few different reports which seem similar, where each have differing solutions.

[Bug 2008463] Re: package clamav-daemon 0.103.6+dfsg-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed clamav-daemon package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 2

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This failed because of the following line: /var/lib/dpkg/info/clamav-daemon.postinst: 428: cannot create /var/lib/clamav/clamav.conf: Directory nonexistent I guess /var/lib/clamav/ directory did not exist during install. I'm not sure how this case occurs. Was there anything interesting you did

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
The only focal autopkgtest that really has me confused in the python2.7 failure. This is due to a unit test that fails. The strange thing is that this unit test actually fails in the Jammy autopkgtest, but the Jammy autopkgtest passes anyways. It has always been like this. You will see 1643s

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
at is blocked in proposed at/riscv64 has unsatisfiable dependency at/s390x has unsatisfiable dependency -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040367 Title: Merge at from Debian unstable

[Bug 2040367] Re: Merge at from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-14 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I don't have time to look into why it is blocked right now, but will take a look next week if I can't get to it tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040367 Title: Merge at from

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-03-20 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage

[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal

2024-03-20 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: postgresql-12 (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (u

[Bug 2058417] [NEW] hibernation not working on m5.large instance first boot

2024-03-19 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Public bug reported: I noticed that when creating an m5.large noble instance, hibernation is not resuming properly after first creation. I haven't had a ton of time to look into it yet, but I did see 2 observations: * hibinit-resume is not being ran * re-running the unit file makes things work

[Bug 2040360] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-05 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
failure for users in a certain scenario. The - removal of the conf file was not included in the merge, but should be - included in-case users upgrade release and carry-over the conf file. - (See LP: 2000186 for reference) - - -- Mitchell Dzurick Wed, 02 Aug 2023 - 10:40:27 -0700

[Bug 2040360] Re: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for noble

2024-03-11 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Thanks Utkarsh! I will re-do the merge today if I have time, but most likely tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040360 Title: [FFE ] Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable

[Bug 2002043] Re: Python extension modules get built using wrong compiler flags with python2

2024-03-13 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
Ran the autopkgtest on a new PPA with my changes enabled by default and the test still fails[0]. I believe this is fine enough to ignore simply because this test has always been failing like this. [0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz- python2.7-opt-test-enabled-

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
This bug seems to have been unfortunately lost to time, or there is discussion I am not aware of about it. Gionatan, if there's still desire for this, I suggest making an upstream bug report[0], as these options are not changed by Ubuntu, but rather come from upstream. I'm setting the bug to

[Bug 1508131] Re: Impossible to login once libpam-smbpass got installed

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
I'm going through old open bugs. I assume this bug is not a problem anymore, mostly due to the package libpam-smbpass not being available since Xenial, and the lack of discussion here. Closing this bug, but please comment if it should be reopened. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: New

[Bug 1970455] Re: AppArmor profile prevents DNS Servers from being added to resolv.conf

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
@server-triage-discuss - looks like there may have been some discussion on this when I wasn't around. Did this mean to get dropped? If so, let's set as Won't Fix. ** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1993837] Re: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive

2024-03-12 Thread Mitchell Dzurick
** Tags added: server-triage-discuss -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993837 Title: apparmor profile libvirt-qemu is too permissive To manage notifications about this bug go to:

  1   2   >