*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1048353 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048353
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1097765
package samba4 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3 failed to install/upgrade -- "The name
'...' is not a valid NetBIOS name"
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1048353 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1048353
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1097765
package samba4 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3 failed to install/upgrade -- "The name
'...' is not a valid NetBIOS name"
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of
** Summary changed:
- provision crashed with InvalidNetbiosName in guess_names(): The name
''LOGAN-VIRTUALBOX'' is not a valid NetBIOS name
+ provision crashed with InvalidNetbiosName in guess_names(): The name
''...-...'' is not a valid NetBIOS name
--
You received this bug notification becau
Note: samba4 Depends on samba4-common-bin (which the submitter has
installed) which contains /usr/bin/samba-tool.
I notice that samba4.postinst runs samba-tool without a path and doesn't
set PATH.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809638 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809638
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809638
samba_dnsupdate crashed with RuntimeError in get_credentials(): kinit for
INTEL$@REALM failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)
** Summary
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809638 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809638
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1036820
samba_dnsupdate crashed with RuntimeError in get_credentials()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809638
samba_dnsupdate crashed with Runti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 809638 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/809638
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 809638
samba_dnsupdate crashed with RuntimeError in get_credentials(): kinit for
INTEL$@REALM failed (Cannot contact any KDC for requested realm)
--
You rec
Shall we just say that alpha is obsolete?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870299
Title:
samba_dnsupdate crashed with IndexError in __init__(): list index out
of range
To manage noti
Does this still happen with 4.0.0+dfsg1-1?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091348
Title:
Error loading module '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/samba//vfs/acl_xattr.so': /usr/lib/x86_64-l
Duh, it was reported against 4.0.0+dfsg1-1! Where is my brain?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091348
Title:
Error loading module '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-
gnu/samba//vfs/acl_xattr.so
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 933723 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933723
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 933723
bind9 registers itself with resolvconf even though it's unable to provide
name service
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Compare bug #113417.
** Summary changed:
- host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()
+ host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
** Summary changed:
- host crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
+ "host -t soa local." SIGSEGV in start_thread() on login
--
You received th
** Summary changed:
- [apport] host crashed with SIGSEGV
+ [apport] "host -t soa local" crashed after resume from suspend
** Summary changed:
- [apport] "host -t soa local" crashed after resume from suspend
+ [apport] "host -t soa local" SIGSEGV after resume from suspend
--
You received this b
Another log showing these messages: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697105
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #697105
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697105
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
I think we can just say that alpha17 is obsolete.
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/827165
Title:
provision crashed with Ldb
It was last updated in December 2012. Surely it doesn't have to be
updated daily?
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
It's now at December 2012.
** Changed in: popularity-contest (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067277
Title:
popcon.ubuntu.com: Ubuntu Popul
@Anthony:
A "dns-options" option in /e/n/i is indeed not currently supported. Do
you need this?
The current practice is to put an "options" line in
/etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
@a_paddy: Thanks. See comment #82 for the most recent summary of causes.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000244
Title:
Symlink /etc/resolv.conf does not exist after installation or up
>there's still the unresolved question
> of whether re-enabling --strict-order
> will suffice as a workaround, since
> 12.10 relies on DBus to populate the
> nameservers. Is there any extra
> information on this?
Please try it and report back. :-)
(Put "strict-order" in a file in /etc/NetworkMa
@Jeremy: Hi, and thanks for the report. Please provide more information
by taking the following steps.
* Reboot
* Log in and open a terminal
* In the terminal, run the following commands with the name of your server
replacing 'XYZ'.
ping XYZ
host XYZ
dig XYZ
ls -l /etc/resolv.con
This may also help:
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Installing_Ubuntu_11.04_(Natty_Narwhal)_on_a_ThinkPad_X220#Fix_for_hotkey_shortcomings
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408903
Title:
Simon in #49:
> It doesn't work [...] the order of servers given to the DBus
> interface isn't preserved internally
Aha, so the answer to my question
> Will switching on strict-order have the same effect
> now that nameserver addresses are sent over D-Bus?
(in comment #42) is "No". So switching
@Jeremy: Is your problem bug #1083565?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114948
Title:
unable to access server on lan by hostname on wi-fi
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Is you problem bug #80900. Does editing /etc/nsswitch.conf so that it
contains
hosts: files dns mdns
fix it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114948
Title:
unable to access serve
Is your problem bug #80900? Does editing /etc/nsswitch.conf so that it
contains
hosts: files dns mdns
fix it?
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1094303 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094303
>From DpkgTerminalLog.txt:
Setting up samba4 (4.0.0+dfsg1-1) ...
ERROR(): Provision failed -
ProvisioningError: guess_names: Workgroup 'ONOS' in smb.conf must match chosen
domain 'WORKGROUP'! Please remo
** Summary changed:
- package samba4 4.0.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade:
"check_password_restrictions: the password does not meet the complexity
criteria!"
+ failed to install/upgrade: "check_password_restrictions: the password does
not meet the complexity criteria!"
--
You received this
** Summary changed:
- package samba4 4.0.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: "samba4.postinst:
samba-tool: not found"
+ failed to install/upgrade: "samba4.postinst: samba-tool: not found"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
** Summary changed:
- package samba4 4.0.0~beta2+dfsg1-3 failed to install/upgrade:
"ProvisioningError: guess_names: Workgroup '...' in smb.conf must match chosen
domain 'WORKGROUP'!"
+ failed to install/upgrade: "ProvisioningError: guess_names: Workgroup '...'
in smb.conf must match chosen dom
Try this. Edit the connection using the Connection Editor and set IPv4
Settings | Method to "Automatic (DHCP) addresses only" instead of
"Automatic (DHCP)". Make sure 8.8.8.8 is still included in the
"Additional DNS servers" field.
Another thing to try is to disable the local forwarding nameserver
Comment #50 described how Mac OS X 10.2 did it. Here is how Mac OS X
v10.[456] does it. (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3473).
"As long as your network's DNS server is properly configured, you do not
have to make any changes on your client Mac.
Host names that contain only one label in addition t
Comment #50 described how Mac OS X 10.2 did it. Here is how Mac OS X
v10.6 does it (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3473).
"As long as your network's DNS server is properly configured, you do not
have to make any changes on your client Mac.
Host names that contain only one label in addition to loca
Will wrote:
> hosts: files dns mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] mdns4
I don't see the point of putting "mdns4_minimal" before "mdns4". Just
"mdns4" should be equivalent and faster, but maybe I'm missing
something.
Jeremy wrote:
> The nsswitch.conf edit fixed it for me.
> Can we please get this as
** Summary changed:
- Eliminate nscd restart from update script?
+ nscd no longer needs to be restarted by libc's resolvconf update script
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110331
Title:
** Summary changed:
- Also truncate nameserver list after a loopback address in resolv.conf.d/head
+ Please also truncate nameserver list after a loopback address in
resolv.conf.d/head
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
- After Upgrading from 11.04 to 12.10 the wifi Network named "300" isn't
- available anymore in networkmanager.
+ After upgrading from 11.04 to 12.10 the Wi-Fi network named "300" isn't
+ available any more in NetworkManager.
** Summary changed:
- wifi network named as nu
What is the exact model number of your device?
Googling for your USB device IDs I found, e.g., this:
http://www.draisberghof.de/usb_modeswitch/bb/viewtopic.php?t=155.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Summary changed:
- No way to customize built-in dnsmasq configuration in 12.04
+ Please backport ability to customize NM-dnsmasq to 12.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114107
Titl
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Description changed:
- Trying to connect using a GSM modem that lacks a SIM card does just give
- the user a general connection failure message without any hints about
- the missing SIM card.
-
- This can fool the user into thi
Could bug #1102092 be related?
** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) => network-manager-applet
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1102317
Title:
Unable to disable network
>From WifiSyslog.txt (eth1 is the Wi-Fi interface):
Jan 31 19:50:37 samsung wpa_supplicant[1307]: eth1: Trying to associate with
2e:c7:9f:d6:30:40 (SSID='[...]' freq=2412 MHz)
Jan 31 19:50:37 samsung wpa_supplicant[1307]: eth1: Association request to the
driver failed
Jan 31 19:50:37 samsung Net
Possible wl driver problem
** Package changed: network-manager (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101534
Title:
Cannot connect to WiFi network -- Broadcom BCM
What is the exact model name of your dongle.
Please reboot, reproduce the failure, connect and then run "apport-
collect 1099696" in a terminal to provide more information.
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you
Am I correct in understanding that the Wi-Fi device in question is a
Ralink and the driver is rt2800usb?
** Summary changed:
- NM doesn't react to disconnect and connect commands for WiFi networks for
very long time (or ever)
+ NM doesn't react to disconnect and connect commands for WiFi network
Public bug reported:
# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages will be upgraded:
libtasn1-3 libtasn1-3:i386
2 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/88.2 kB of arc
# apt-cache madison libtasn1-3 libtasn1-3:i386 | grep 2.14
libtasn1-3 | 2.14-2 | http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main
amd64 Packages
libtasn1-3 | 2.14-2 | http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ raring/main
Sources
libtasn1-3:i386 | 2.14-2 | http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubunt
Can you reproduce this bug in the 4.0.0+dfsg1-1 version of the Samba 4
package?
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/990049
>From DpkgTerminalLog:
Looking up IPv4 addresses
ERROR: Could not determine network interfaces, you must use a interfaces config
line
WARNING: no network interfaces found
talloc: access after free error - first free may be at °-
Bad talloc magic value - access after free
Aborted
dpkg: error pro
Please reboot and then run "apport-collect 1114600" to provide more
information about the affected system.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1114600
Title:
Wi-Fi network with numerical n
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1103809
Title:
nm-applet stops accepting keyboard input
To manage notif
I can reproduce this.
** Changed in: network-manager-applet (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1099633
Title:
network manager static ip gui bug
** Description changed:
What I did:
01. apt-get install samba4
02. /etc/init.d/samba4 stop
03. rm /etc/samba/smb.conf
04. samba-tool domain provision --realm s4test.* --domain S4 --adminpass
* --server-role=dc
05. /etc/bind9 stop
06. apt-get remove bind9
07. /etc/init.d/sa
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000244
Title:
Symlink /etc/resolv.conf does not exist after installation or u
Hi Simon.
Before I forget to ask: can you please update dnsmasq(8) to include
under "--strict-order" a description of what happens when nameserver
addresses are passed in via D-Bus instead of via a file?
You wrote,
> you can very easily provide the same behaviour - only pass the first
> nameserv
[...cont'd after "in order to fix"...] bug #1072899, dnsmasq will have
to be enhanced such that proposition #1 is true. But we can discuss the
details of that in bug #1072899.
There is a close analogy between the problem here (bug #1003842) and a problem
we have with avahi. Avahi resolves names
Actually the change will appear in 1.70.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110331
Title:
nscd no longer needs to be restarted by libc's resolvconf update
script
To manage notificatio
I was able to work around this by doing
dpkg --remove --force-all libtasn1 libtasn1-3:i386
apt-get install libtasn1 libtasn1-3:i386
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1116310
Title
It is possible that I had one of those packages installed from Debian
Experimental already.
I notice that the Raring packages are not identical to the ones in
Experimental, even though they have no Ubuntu version suffix. The
difference in size is a surprising.
>From http://packages.debian.org/exp
Simon wrote:
> Consider
[...]
> server=/google.com/3.3.3.3
> server=/google.com/4.4.4.4
[...]
> Queries sent to *google.com will be sent 3.3.3.3 or 4.4.4.4 in the
> same way as if strict order was set, ie, to 3.3.3.3 first, and only to
> 4.4.4.4 if 3.3.3.3 returns a SERVFAIL or REFUSED error, or do
Earlier there was some dispute about what the RFCs say about multiple
nameservers.
I found the following RFC which does have something to say about these
issues.
http://www.zoneedit.com/doc/rfc/rfc2182.txt
Here are a couple of passages...
Request for Comments: 2182
Category: Best Current Pr
The target milestone should be adjusted, I guess.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1003842
Title:
dnsmasq sometimes fails to resolve private names in networks with non-
equivalent nam
** Summary changed:
- "network path not found" on joining a client to AD; "+smb -s3fs" fixes it;
please automate this
+ "network path not found" on joining a client to AD; "+smb -s3fs; +winreg
+srvsvc" fixes it; please automate this
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
"My system doesn't work today" is not a bug report.
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1120228
Title:
DNS can't be resolv
Done in recently released Debian resolvconf 1.70.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110331
Title:
nscd no longer needs to be restarted by libc's resolvconf update
script
To manage no
Done in recently released Debian resolvconf 1.70.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094345
Title:
IPv6 DHCP record too late, and other irregularities, in resolvconf
interface-order
T
I have been testing nscd for a while and have discovered, alas, that
although nscd notices when resolv.conf changes — e.g., when it needs to
do a DNS query it uses the correct nameserver address — it does *not*
invalidate its hosts cache when resolv.conf changes. This causes
problems when connectin
Or:
* Create a flag file that records the fact that we have created the symlink;
* don't create the symlink again if the flag file exists;
* delete the flag file on reconfigure or remove.
Any objections?
If not then I will implement it this way in Debian.
--
You received this bug notification
Something like the following. Then Ubuntu just has to uncomment the
indicated line and comment the line before it.
diff --git a/debian/postinst b/debian/postinst
index 2b4faf7..3822ece 100755
--- a/debian/postinst
+++ b/debian/postinst
@@ -113,9 +113,13 @@ case "$1" in
fi
# Linki
top|force-reload|restart|status|invalidate-hosts}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
Should you implement this, please Suggest resolvconf (>= 1.70) and Conflict
with resolvconf (<< 1.70), since those older versions of resolvconf restarted
nscd if resolv.conf changed and ns
top|force-reload|restart|status|invalidate-hosts}" >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
Should you implement this, please Suggest resolvconf (>= 1.70) and Conflict
with resolvconf (<< 1.70), since those older versions of resolvconf restarted
nscd if resolv.conf chang
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1123424 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123424
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700385
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700385
** Also affects: eglibc (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700385
I
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1123424 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123424
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1123424
nscd: Either fix automatic hosts cache invalidation or add resolvconf update
script to invalidate the hosts cache
--
You received this bug notific
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #700385
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700385
** Also affects: eglibc (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=700385
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Summary changed:
- problem in wifi network configuration
+ NM fails to recognize already configured Wi-Fi connection
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123829
Title:
NM fails to reco
The Huawei EC1260 is not listed upstream as a supported model
https://live.gnome.org/NetworkManager/MobileBroadband
Nevertheless, I found a bug report in the upstream bugzilla related to
this model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663535
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker
** Summary changed:
- package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 126
+ package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
"samba4.postinst: /usr/share/samba/setoption.pl: Perm
@Cerin: Was your comment (#117) intended for this bug report?
(This report is about the /etc/resolv.conf symlink sometimes being
missing after installation of the resolvconf package, but your comment
was about a difficulty switching between Wi-Fi networks.)
--
You received this bug notification
I am the author and maintainer of resolvconf in Debian. Unfortunately I
don't know enough about upstart to maintain resolvconf for Ubuntu.
In its current condition in Ubuntu (universe) the resolvconf package
does not work properly.
If no one is willing to maintain resolvconf in Ubuntu then it sh
Public bug reported:
When I run memtest86+ on a ThinkPad X61 with 4 GiB memory, memtest
reports failures at locations starting with "4096M". Makes sense, since
there is no memory above 4096 MiB.
Printing out all the errors slows down the program a lot. I would like
to skip testing the non-exist
What's in /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/tail?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067043
Title:
resolvconf adds an empty "nameserver" record into /etc/resolv.conf
To manage notifications
Hmm, OK we'll have to look deeper. Please post the output of the
following commands run in a terminal.
ls -l /etc/resolv.conf
cat /etc/resolv.conf
ls -l /etc/default/resolvconf
cat /etc/default/resolvconf
ls -l /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d
for F in /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/* ; do echo === $
@Charles: Can you please explain why this report has been reclassified
as "Fix Released"? Which kernel version contains the fix? How has this
fix been tested?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
@Charles: I've had the same problem in the past. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/992424
Title:
ext4 filesystem errors on SSD disk
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
htt
Another data point. I just stumbled across AskUbuntu question #137037
and noticed that seven people have voted up the answer to run "dpkg-
reconfigure resolvconf". That suggests that seven people had to run
that command, i.e., that seven people were lacking the symlink for some
reason.
http:/
Yep, nasty enough for me to stop using my new 240 GB Intel "520 series"
SSD (model number SSDSC2CW240A3) and return to my old Hitachi 320GB HD
which works perfectly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
The empty "nameserver" line comes from
/run/resolvconf/interface/br0.inet which was created by the script
/etc/network/if-up.d/000resolvconf from the content of the
IF_DNS_NAMESERVERS variable whose contents come from the "dns-
nameservers" line in the "iface br0" stanza of /etc/network/interfaces.
@Svartalf: Can you please describe in more technical detail what fails
to work on the machines in question, and share with us what you know
about the causes of these malfunctionings? Once we have some idea what
you're talking about we can help you further.
You wrote:
> there's tons of local insta
Well, you actually have to ifdown and ifup the interface (br0) to test
properly. But since there are no non-printing characters on the dns-
nameservers line I guess my hypothesis has been disproved. Hmm.
** Changed in: resolvconf (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bu
** Summary changed:
- Intel 5100 AGN (iwlwifi) hangs frequently -- intermittent operation
+ dnsmasq works intermittently
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1058089
Title:
dnsmasq works i
I just got this too. The update-apt-xapian-index command slowed down at
around 30%, finally reached 70% or so before reporting
Rebuilding Xapian index: done.
Killed
While running, the top command showed:
%CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
29.5 75.1 3:01.79 update-apt-xapi
14.4
Not reproducible any more with version 1.9.1.
** Changed in: sssd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1049186
Title:
sssd sometimes forgets all
Public bug reported:
I've been researching the appearance of an error message in
sssd_nss.log.
[sssd[nss]] [nss_cmd_getpwuid_search] (0x0040): No matching domain
found for [-1], fail!
Although I don't know yet where this "-1" is coming from, I have
discovered something else which indicates
FIrst, I'd like to know exactly what /etc/network/if-up.d/000resolvconf
is receiving in the IF_DNS_NAMESERVERS variable. Please apply the
appended patch, down and up the br0 interface, confirm that
/run/resolvconf/interface/br0.inet still contains
nameserver 66.185.16.130
nameserver
n
This behavior reflects the fact that resolvconf will not attempt to
create the symbolic link /etc/resolv.conf ->
../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf on upgrade. See bug #922677 for
background.
A workaround is to *purge resolvconf, install it, then reboot.
--
You received this bug notification because
@Cerin: You say that disabling and re-enabling wireless connection
corrects resolv.conf. Please run the following commands when
resolv.conf is correct, so we know what you mean by that.
cat /etc/resolv.conf
ls -l /run/resolvconf/interface
for F in /run/resolvconf/interface/* ; do echo
Cerin, in your earlier comment (#75) you posted the results of several
commands. The content of /etc/resolv.conf was incorrect. It was:
# Generated by NetworkManager
domain home
search home
nameserver 127.0.0.1
If this file had been generated by resolvconf, it would have begun wi
@Cerin: The resolvconf package only creates the symbolic link
/etc/resolv.conf --> ../run/resolvconf/resolv.conf once, on initial
installation. The package can be caused to repeat this action by running
"dpkg-reconfigure resolvconf" and agreeing to "linkify"
/etc/resolv.conf. However, it is certain
@Cerin: We need to find out which program it is that is not interfacing
correctly with resolvconf.
So far as I know all Ubuntu software interfaces correctly with
resolvconf. It is known that some third party software doesn't interface
correctly with resolvconf. Are you using a VPN client? Which
** Description changed:
As found at bug 1052664
$ dpkg-query --show network-manager
network-manager 0.9.6.0-0ubuntu7
$ cat /etc/hostname
# xxx by cloud-init
domU-12-31-39-0C-6C-81
This *should* be ok, as per 'man hostname':
--F, --file filename
-
601 - 700 of 3374 matches
Mail list logo
