I think the point of their argument is that you can install that from
apt if you need it, but it shouldn't be installed by default for
aesthetics and size reasons.
...and it was quickly pointed out that the size was
insignificant/negligible in this case, wasn't it? If you guys are
concerned
I'd like to voice my user opinion on the matter.
I use mist, even though it is fugly compared to Clearlooks, because it
is BLAZINGLY fast. The two are not even in the same fruit family
comparing them, especially if you are running at 1920x1200 and dealing
with webpages. For example, have, say,
Le jeudi 09 octobre 2008, à 23:33 +0200, Kenneth Wimer a écrit :
I think that if we replaced the aging themes we could, in their place,
include
a couple of interesting new ones. I think users would get much more out of
being able to select a modern sexy theme. In this way we offer our
Ysgrifennodd Kenneth Wimer:
I think that if we replaced the aging themes we could, in their place,
include
a couple of interesting new ones. I think users would get much more out of
being able to select a modern sexy theme. In this way we offer our default
theme, accessability themes and
Thomas Thurman wrote:
Ysgrifennodd Kenneth Wimer:
I think that if we replaced the aging themes we could, in their place,
include
a couple of interesting new ones. I think users would get much more out of
being able to select a modern sexy theme. In this way we offer our default
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Mark Shuttleworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas, has there been any discussion about creating a standardised online
repo of themes, with dynamic access from the appearance manager? Then we
could highlight the standard GNOME themes there.
Something like
Ysgrifennodd Wouter Stomp:
Something like Gnome-Art Next Gen would be nice to include by default,
allowing easy access to plenty of new wallpapers and themes, including
the official gnome ones. A video showcasing it is at
http://www.vimeo.com/1354516
aha, so there is already something like
