On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 15:33, Andrew SB wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Danny Piccirillo
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:50, Alin-Andrei wrote:
>>> As far as I know, Solang was even removed from Debian due to it being highly
>>> unstable.
>>
>> I don't believe it was removed, b
Le 20/05/2010 20:19, Danny Piccirillo a écrit :
>> - depending on tracker is a blocker, we had tracker activated by default
>> in previous ubuntu version but had to stop doing that due to the impact
>> it's having on system performances and io load. We will likely look at
>> the new tracker and eva
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Danny Piccirillo
wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:50, Alin-Andrei wrote:
>> As far as I know, Solang was even removed from Debian due to it being highly
>> unstable.
>
> I don't believe it was removed, but simply wasn't packaged in time?
http://bugs.debian.org
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 04:50, Alin-Andrei wrote:
> As far as I know, Solang was even removed from Debian due to it being highly
> unstable.
I don't believe it was removed, but simply wasn't packaged in time?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 05:29, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 à 03:38
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:56:13AM +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> IMHO, the correct stance on this would be: change if it turns out new
> apps are really better than the current one. If not, better be
> conservative. Adopting an app which is still in progress won't help
> making it better.
No
VP8 (libvpx) landed in the Chromium daily PPA this morning if anyone
wants to try it
https://launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/ppa
You can search for videos to play on YouTube with
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=web&webm=1
2010/5/20 Shane Fagan :
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 09:20
Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 à 11:29 +0200, Sebastien Bacher a écrit :
> - we can revisit our choice next cycle, we try to ship the best of what
> is available in the opensource world in Ubuntu, if it turns that solang
> is much better we will consider it next cycle
Are we really in a hurry? Switching twic
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 09:20 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 01:21 +0100, Shane Fagan wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Can we include WebM the new codec from Google in Maverick? I presume
> > there would be lots of interest coming for this and integration in the
> > desktop and the
Le jeudi 20 mai 2010 à 03:38 -0400, Danny Piccirillo a écrit :
> If Solang
> proved itself in time for Maverick +1 i'm afraid it would be left out
> simply because we've already changed the default once recently.
Hi,
Do you work on solang? You seem to be pushing a lot for it. Robert did a
good s
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:04, Robert Ancell
wrote:
> Some points that were in favour of Shotwell:
> - Already packaged in Ubuntu Universe (i.e. it has good user exposure)
I don't really consider this to make it a better application at all.
> - Full-time developer resource (Yorba)
Shotwell has
Some points that were in favour of Shotwell:
- Already packaged in Ubuntu Universe (i.e. it has good user exposure)
- Full-time developer resource (Yorba)
- Very fast load and browsing speed
Shotwell does not have all the functionality we want before it will
replace F-Spot, but we are tracking t
11 matches
Mail list logo
