Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Christopher James Halse Rogers
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:01 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 01:09 -0700, Bryce Harrington a écrit : > > Boiling Matt's post down this is what I'm reading: > > > > 1. NIH > > 2. It doesn't start a GNOME session > > 3. Doesn't have arbitrary shiny stuff like slid

Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Boiling Matt's post down this is what I'm reading: > 1. NIH > 2. It doesn't start a GNOME session > 3. Doesn't have arbitrary shiny stuff like slidy effects > 4. Auto-update when users are created or deleted > 5. Accessibility functionality

Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Matthew East
On 8 June 2011 09:09, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:45:38AM +0100, Matthew East wrote: >> On 8 June 2011 02:58, Bryce Harrington wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Matthew East wrote: >> >> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the

Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 01:09 -0700, Bryce Harrington a écrit : > Boiling Matt's post down this is what I'm reading: > > 1. NIH > 2. It doesn't start a GNOME session > 3. Doesn't have arbitrary shiny stuff like slidy effects > 4. Auto-update when users are created or deleted > 5. Acce

Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 08:45:38AM +0100, Matthew East wrote: > On 8 June 2011 02:58, Bryce Harrington wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Matthew East wrote: > >> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the > >> proposed switch to lightDM from Matthew Garret

Re: Call for testing: LightDM

2011-06-08 Thread Matthew East
On 8 June 2011 02:58, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:03:12AM +0100, Matthew East wrote: >> I'm taking this opportunity to post a link to this comment on the >> proposed switch to lightDM from Matthew Garrett, in case people >> reading here haven't seen it, it seems relevant t