Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-19 Thread Jason Warner
Hi Colin - On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 6:08 AM, Colin Law wrote: > On 17 August 2012 01:51, Jason Warner wrote: > > ... > > But there is a cost to this decision. Unity 2D fit a very specific use > case > > in very low-end and non-GPU accelerated hardware. By consolidating to > Unity > > using LLVMp

Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-19 Thread Jason Warner
Hi Paolo - On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Paolo Pisati wrote: > IOWs, since there's still no 3d omap4 driver in Q, no matter what we do, > from now on omap4 desktop image will be "broken", right? (and thus beta1 > too) Yes, that would be correct. A compiz GLES branch is being worked on at th

Re: Unity Going Forward

2012-08-19 Thread Jason Warner
Hi Florian- On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Florian Diesch wrote: > > Still, with all the above, there will be systems that are simply too > > old to run Unity. In those cases it would be necessary to either > > stick with 12.04 LTS or run another desktop environment[4]. > > What will people run