[Bug 1885730] Re: Please switch default, hwe, oem kernel flavours governor to CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y , such that advanced userspace utilities such as game-mode can be later used to rev

2020-08-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@colin-king with or without additional measurements default to performance and relying on userspace to switch to ondemand at some later point during boot is wrong. It means we are risking melting laptops and catching fire. I.e. boot machine, walk away, it sits in the initrd at the LUKS unlock promp

[Bug 1885730] Re: Please switch default, hwe, oem kernel flavours governor to CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=y , such that advanced userspace utilities such as game-mode can be later used to rev

2020-08-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@julian Ubuntu Desktop in 20.04.2 will receive the 20.10's kernel by default and thus will adopt the 20.10 default. Imho the linux-generic (ga) kernel should also be updated to the same default, to make it the same across -generic, -hwe, -oem kernel flavours in 20.04. Because in 20.04, defaulting t

[Bug 1885730] Re: Bring back ondemand.service or switch kernel default governor for pstate - pstate now defaults to performance governor

2020-07-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
@colin-king @juliank It feels to me that the oem flavour should default to (powersave/ondemand), as it is more-or-less laptop kernel flavour. I feel like generic kernel flavour should remain on performance. I feel like we should have a unit, that for chassis=laptop turns on (powersave/ondemand).

Re: 64 bit iso with 32 bit uefi ?

2017-10-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 3 October 2017 at 17:18, Khurshid Alam wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > I don't know much about this topic. Can you point to more information about > this issue? Specifically, can you find a source for your 10 million claim? > > > I think it v

Re: 64 bit iso with 32 bit uefi ?

2017-10-03 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 3 October 2017 at 09:46, Khurshid Alam wrote: > Hi, > > I have few questions about 32 bit support in Ubuntu. > I guess specifically about 32bit uefi support. None of the ubuntu installation medias for any releases have 32bit UEFI support, thus the machines either actually have 64bi uefi suppo

Re: Change of scope and target market for i386

2017-09-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
John Ledkov wrote: > ## > NB! this is a mailing list for developers, and this is a _proposal_ > that I want to discuss with the *buntu developers. There is no need to > OMG this, especially since this is a recurring discussion every single > development cycle for

Re: network-manager, MAC randomization and incompatible hardware

2017-08-15 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 15 August 2017 at 14:32, Will Cooke wrote: > > On 12 August 2017 at 14:37, Robie Basak wrote: >> >> I'd like to draw attention to this bug: >> >> https://launchpad.net/bugs/1681513 "Ubuntu 17.04/17.10: New feature in >> NetworkManager stops several WiFi adapters from working (MAC Address >> Ra

Re: Experience on switching to GNOME Shell

2017-05-17 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 17 May 2017 at 23:28, Robert Ancell wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been using GNOME Shell for about a month now and I've had open a Google > Doc that I've been using to list down the things that I would like to see > resolved by 18.04 to ship a great experience. > > Now I have a bit of a list, I'm w

Re: Keyboard layout switching in modern Ubuntus

2017-05-02 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 1 May 2017 at 22:40, Nrbrtx wrote: > Dear Ubuntu developers! > > I have just upgraded my machines from 12.04 to 14.04. > > After upgrades I discovered that there are some issues with keyboard layout > switching. > I have two keyboard layouts - English and Russian. > I prefer to install GNOME Fl

Re: lightdm or gdm?

2017-04-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 April 2017 at 15:32, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Hey there, > > That's a topic that was mentioned during the meeting yesterday and > something we need to decide on early in the cycle since there is going > to be work needed on that front to have a fully working session. > > I'm doing a small s

Re: Proposal: (No?) email client for Ubuntu 17.10

2017-04-19 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 19 April 2017 at 13:41, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >>By default, Nylas syncs your email to their servers. > > It looks like that's not true any more. You still need a sync server > for things besides the email messages themselves. > https://blog.

Re: Proposal: (No?) email client for Ubuntu 17.10

2017-04-18 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 18 April 2017 at 21:07, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > If we do include an email client, which one? I am worried about this, especially in the enterprise environment people do want to access corporate mail. I am also worried as to what will be the default URL handler for "mailto:"; links. If we dec

Re: GTK 3.12 coming to Utopic?

2014-08-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 August 2014 17:10, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le 09/08/2014 19:03, Adam Dingle a écrit : > > Hey Adam, > > There was not much change on that front. I'm Ccing Marco who is supposed to > be looking at the support for cds in Unity, maybe he can give us a status > update there... > What's the de

Re: A new "Unity 8" flavour

2014-05-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 14 May 2014 17:15, Stephen M. Webb wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 05/14/2014 12:09 PM, Iain Lane wrote: >> >> The desktop team would like to add a new flavour (ish, we don't plan to have >> any formal releases at this point) of >> Ubuntu which contains the Un

Re: GTK 3.12 coming to Utopic?

2014-05-14 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 14 May 2014 15:08, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > > Le 14/05/2014 15:18, Adam Dingle a écrit : > > Congratulations to everyone on the recent Trusty release! > > > > Hey Adam, thanks! ;-) > > > I'm looking forward to an Ubuntu build with GTK 3.12 so I can build > > newer versions of various GNOME app

Re: Include samba and libpam-smbpass by default in Ubuntu

2014-01-04 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 27 December 2013 00:59, pabloalmeida...@gmail.com wrote: > As suggested by a triager of a bug I reported on this issue, I'm bringing > this idea for discussion on this list. If this is the wrong place, feel free > to point me to the right one. > > When one tries to share a folder in the network

Re: Fwd: Call for testing - unity-control-center (fork of gnome-control-center so we can stay on an old version)

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 10:14, Kai Mast wrote: > I did not run into any problems on my machine until now when using the PPA. > :) > > > On 12/11/2013 10:26 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > On 11 December 2013 09:09, Martin Pitt wrote: > >> Dimitri John Ledkov [2013-1

Re: Fwd: Call for testing - unity-control-center (fork of gnome-control-center so we can stay on an old version)

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 09:09, Martin Pitt wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov [2013-12-11 9:05 +]: >> I see what you mean. one could iterate all user sessions and restart >> indicator-session in each one, but that is also intrusive. > > That sounds interesting, and would avoid pk

Re: Fwd: Call for testing - unity-control-center (fork of gnome-control-center so we can stay on an old version)

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 08:57, Martin Pitt wrote: > Dimitri John Ledkov [2013-12-11 8:54 +]: >> Well, it's managed by session upstart, so one could simply do/trigger >> $ restart indicator-session > > Nope, postinst runs in a system/root context, not in a deskto

Fwd: Call for testing - unity-control-center (fork of gnome-control-center so we can stay on an old version)

2013-12-11 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 December 2013 08:12, Martin Pitt wrote: > After upgrading, the menu entry from the session indicator doesn't > work. This needs a "pkill -f indicator-session-service" or a reboot; > could the pkill perhaps be put into the postinst? > Well, it's managed by session upstart, so one could simpl