On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:18 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 10:12 -0400, Jorge O. Castro wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com
wrote:
How would this affect application authors, would they need to go update
again?
what do
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com wrote:
[...]
So, for next cycle, I would suggest a small goal of trying to do patch
upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
Great idea :)
Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:30 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com
wrote:
[...]
So, for next cycle, I would suggest a small goal of trying to do patch
upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
On 04/07/2011 09:23 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Priority: medium?
While working on the GNOME3 PPA during this cycle, I found we have a lot
of patches in many packages, which makes things harder when upgrading to
major versions, and also introduces new ways for the apps to fail, as
the fixes are
Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators ones are
duplicated in lots of packages, so it would be good if we could find a
better way to make upstream apps use them, like, for instance, patching
gtk_status_icon_* in GTK itself to use the indicators when available,
instead of
