Hello Matthew,
Matthew East [2009-08-31 15:42 +0200]:
> This is surely a bug in gnome-terminal, isn't it?
I'd say it is, yes.
> If so, can't we just do some testing and try and make sure that such
> bugs are fixed upstream? I'm willing to help test and report bugs.
I was just afraid that this
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello again,
>
>> to get yelp to pick up the omf files in that location, I'm
>> pretty certain you only need to modify rarian
>
> Argh, while this seems true for most programs, it already breaks with
> gnome-terminal. That unfortunately doesn'
Shaun McCance [2009-08-30 10:34 -0500]:
> OK. I'm not a packaging expert, so I'll just have to trust
> you on this one. But I don't see how splitting a package
> into subpackages is any different than what gets done now
> with -dev packages.
If a file moves from e. g. libfoo1 to libfoo-dev, then
Hello again,
> to get yelp to pick up the omf files in that location, I'm
> pretty certain you only need to modify rarian
Argh, while this seems true for most programs, it already breaks with
gnome-terminal. That unfortunately doesn't just call
ghelp:gnome-terminal (as most other GNOME programs
Hello Matthew, hello Shaun,
Matthew East [2009-08-27 23:19 +0100]:
> I've had a chat this evening with Shaun Mccance, the Gnome yelp
> maintainer. It seems that yelp gets its paths from rarian, and rarian
> gets its paths from the content of the omf files. So we can patch the
> omf files (seems to
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Matthew East wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Matthew East [2009-08-27 19:36 +0100]:
>>> I suspect that it should be possible to add an alternative search path
>>> to yelp so that it checks in more than one location.
>>
>> It's not jus
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Matthew East [2009-08-27 19:36 +0100]:
>> I suspect that it should be possible to add an alternative search path
>> to yelp so that it checks in more than one location.
>
> It's not just yelp, though, there are also the omf files which seem to
>
Matthew East [2009-08-27 19:36 +0100]:
> I suspect that it should be possible to add an alternative search path
> to yelp so that it checks in more than one location.
It's not just yelp, though, there are also the omf files which seem to
be handled by rarian?
> Likewise, it seems to me that such
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> With normal gettext mo files we solved that problem by storing them in
> a separate directory (/usr/share/locale-langpack/), but doing the same
> is not that easy for GNOME help; I'm not quite sure whether adding an
> alternative sea
Loïc Minier [2009-08-27 18:31 +0200]:
> Perhaps instead of stripping the files entirely from regular packages
> you could make them symlink to a langpack specific location? We'd then
> investigate over time which apps need to patched to work with the
> langpack location directly, or just keep
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009, Martin Pitt wrote:
> With normal gettext mo files we solved that problem by storing them in
> a separate directory (/usr/share/locale-langpack/), but doing the same
> is not that easy for GNOME help; I'm not quite sure whether adding an
> alternative search path to yelp and ra
Hello all,
one of our long-term goals to reclaim some much needed CD space has
been to move the translated text and images in /usr/share/gnome/help/
and /usr/share/omf/project/*-.omf from the actual GNOME
packages into language-pack-*. (We are currently 10 MB oversized, and
only have three langpac
12 matches
Mail list logo
