Re: changing the python default from 2.6 to 2.7

2010-12-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:51:24 pm Matthias Klose wrote: > On 08.12.2010 01:30, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote: > >> Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version > >> in Natty from 2.6 to 2.7. > > > > Wher

Re: changing the python default from 2.6 to 2.7

2010-12-07 Thread Matthias Klose
On 08.12.2010 01:30, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote: >> Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version in >> Natty from 2.6 to 2.7. > > Where did we do the assessment of the rebuilds done over the weekend that was > d

Re: changing the python default from 2.6 to 2.7

2010-12-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, December 07, 2010 07:05:03 pm Matthias Klose wrote: > Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version in > Natty from 2.6 to 2.7. Where did we do the assessment of the rebuilds done over the weekend that was decided on at the Release Team meeting? Scott K --

changing the python default from 2.6 to 2.7

2010-12-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Tomorrow, Wednesday December 8, we'll change the default Python version in Natty from 2.6 to 2.7. This will be followed by a series of no-change uploads to rebuild packages with Python 2.7. Some parts of the archive will be uninstallable or not upgradeable for a few days; please wait with upgrade

Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting Minutes - 2010-12-07

2010-12-07 Thread Brad Figg
= Meeting Minutes = [[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/12/07/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the meeting.]] <> [[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]] == Agenda == [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 07 Dec, 2010|20101207 Meeting Agenda]] === ARM

Re: Reject mythtv 1:0.24.0+fixes27162-0ubuntu1

2010-12-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
must be discussed in ubuntu-devel@ and if -fPIC is not going to be used, then it be documented in README.Debian. You are following the process here, which is good. In looking at the comments in the bug[1] and the debdiff for 2:0.24.0+fixes.20101207.d3d2640-0ubuntu1 the issue is resolved for me

Before starting work on something...

2010-12-07 Thread Daniel Holbach
Hello everybody, I'm sure this happened to all of us already: you start work on something and notice that somebody else had already done the work. If a lot of work was involved, it's quite a waste of time and if work from new contributors is ignored that's a bit discouraging. Of course nobody real