Excerpts from Kees Cook's message of Wed Apr 06 15:14:38 -0700 2011:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:53:46PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:35:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > He offers this as a test case:
> >
> > I can confirm the behavior difference between maverick
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:53:46PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:35:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > He offers this as a test case:
>
> I can confirm the behavior difference between maverick and natty by doing
> this:
>
> while ./testcase.pl ; do echo -n . ; done
>
>
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 05:53:46 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:35:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > He offers this as a test case:
> I can confirm the behavior difference between maverick and natty by doing
> this:
>
> while ./testcase.pl ; do echo -n .
Hi Scott,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:35:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> He offers this as a test case:
I can confirm the behavior difference between maverick and natty by doing
this:
while ./testcase.pl ; do echo -n . ; done
On maverick, this runs forever. Natty immediately fails:
Parent
There's recently been a ~long thread on amavis-users [1] about restart
problems in Natty. This is also an Ubuntu bug [2]. The conclusion of the
thread is (from the amavis upstream):
> So what this means for restarting amavis: it means that on Ubuntu Natty
> a start of amavisd must not occur be
Hello Michael,
Michael Biebl [2011-04-05 21:53 +0200]:
> For other packages that currently use /var/run (which are quite a few), I'd
> prefer if they kept using /var/run for another release cycle and are not (yet)
> patched to use /run directly.
I thought the idea was to have /var/run now become
Thanks for every person who helped me in development for Ubuntu project.
Work with you was a pleasure.
--
Pozdrawiam / Kind regards,
Artur Rona
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
Dear Ubuntu developers and community,
The Ubuntu Developer Membership board and Community Council have jointly
decided to remove an Ubuntu Member, ari-tczew from the project due to
repeated Code of Conduct violations.
This was an extremely difficult decision to take, and one which we did
not make
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Michael Terry
wrote:
> On 02/04/11 09:56, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>
>> This has long been "good practice" for a variety of reasons
>
> I agree with all your reasons, but tend to prefer ~lucid1, ~maverick1, etc.
> in case the same package is available for multiple rele
Am 05.04.2011 19:19, schrieb Colin Watson:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 08:57:36AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> ]] Scott Kitterman
>> | See http://lwn.net/Articles/436012/ and the current debian-devel thread on
>> the
>> | topic for details:
>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/04/msg0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2011 01:14 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> We got HAL out of Main this cycle. In oneiric, let's make it a goal to get
> it
> out of the archive.
>
> Scott K
>
> $ apt-cache rdepends hal
> hal
> Reverse Depends:
> laptop-mode-tools
I'll
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
...
>> Why universe is hard-frozen as well?
>
> Launchpad doesn't give us the ability to be selective.
>
However, we would happily accept a patch to be more selective,
provided there was collective agreement from Ubuntu developers that
this woul
I was *really* impressed with how well etherpad handled the load of
hundreds of people with no downtime at the linux plumbers conference
last year, a bigger server running it would do fine I imagine..
http://etherpad.osuosl.org/lpc2010-desktop
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubun
13 matches
Mail list logo
