This merge means that with bzr 2.4 (trunk) bzr commit will set the
changelog from debian/changelog and set tags for any bugs closed in
the changelog.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-builddeb/+bug/791893
Jonathan
- Forwarded message from nore...@launchpad.net -
Reply-To:
This is a daily health check report on the Ubuntu Studio CD images.
If you have any questions, contact Colin Watson cjwat...@ubuntu.com.
ubuntustudio/daily: Uninstallable packages:
cdrdao 1:1.2.3-0.1ubuntu1 produces uninstallable binaries:
* gcdmaster (amd64 i386)
ubuntustudio-meta 0.83
Hi folks,
I still lirk here and read some discussion from time to time, and one thing I
noticed was the daily report of uninstallability issues with the studio images,
the latest one involving gcdmaster/cdrdao. I have fixed that issue in the
seeds, and am presently uploading a new meta to fix
On mer., 2011-06-08 at 16:55 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
- What should we cut from the current DVD image (currently a superset of
desktop, alternate, and server)? Or, perhaps more simply, what would be
worth adding beyond the current 700MB CD image?
If we have the machinery to
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 05:52:17PM -0400, Francis J. Lacoste wrote:
Hello,
When user file bugs on the distribution and enter a package name in the
widget, Launchpad automatically adds a line to the description with
Binary package hint: binarypackagename
I would welcome its disappearance.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:50:30PM -0700, Allison Randal wrote:
At UDS-O, we discussed CD space again (as at many a past UDS). Colin has
nicely summarized the discussion:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/OneiricCDSizing
Following on the tail of this, a few of us have been
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:50:30 -0700, Allison Randal alli...@canonical.com
wrote:
- What should we cut from the current DVD image (currently a superset of
desktop, alternate, and server)? Or, perhaps more simply, what would be
worth adding beyond the current 700MB CD image?
Does the DVD install
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 01:15:55PM -0400, James Westby wrote:
I don't think I've ever needed to know which particular binary package
of a source is at fault.
This was exactly the logic for Launchpad Bugs being source package oriented,
rather than binary package oriented like debbugs. The
Hello everybody,
here's what I got around to doing today:
*
https://code.launchpad.net/~abone/ubuntu/natty/procps/fix-for-753124/+merge/58905
*
https://code.launchpad.net/~akkzilla/ubuntu/natty/gmemusage/gmemusage-fix-370735/+merge/61171
*
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:23:31AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Phillip Susi [2011-06-08 21:52 -0400]:
One thing that would be nice to fix with the existing DVD image is the
waste of space it has from duplicating the language packs both as
packages in the pool, and being installed in the
Steve Langasek [2011-06-09 10:49 -0700]:
Is there any reason that they have to be in the squashfs image to get that
effect? I know that's how it's architected today, but would it actually be
a better experience to have a much smaller squashfs that needs to be
unpacked, to which the correct
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:36:30PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Steve Langasek [2011-06-09 10:49 -0700]:
Is there any reason that they have to be in the squashfs image to get that
effect? I know that's how it's architected today, but would it actually be
a better experience to have a much
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:51:27PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
I wouldn't like this to result in any additional prompts; we should be able
to auto-install these for the user based on their language selection in
either the bootloader (in which case casper can do the setup), or in
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:51:27PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
I wouldn't like this to result in any additional prompts; we should be
able
to auto-install these for the user based on their language selection in
either the
Hi,
Here's what I worked through today:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen/+bug/790854
reviewed and approved xen MIR
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apg/+bug/785682
reviewed and approved apg MIR
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/785680
Stéphane Graber [2011-06-09 20:03 -0400]:
Indeed, not sure what we should do to avoid that.
A workaround would be to bump the minimal RAM requirement for install by
whatever the biggest langpack needs (50MB ?). Or alternatively, detect
that we won't have enough RAM and just not install the
Hello
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
Robbie Williamson schreef op wo 01-06-2011 om 10:54 [-0500]:
I don't have much experience of working on large projects like that and
this
is also a reason why I want to contribute to open source and to
contribute
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Gaurav Saxena grvsaxena...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jan Claeys li...@janc.be wrote:
Robbie Williamson schreef op wo 01-06-2011 om 10:54 [-0500]:
I don't have much experience of working on large projects like that
and this
18 matches
Mail list logo
