Please file a RT for installation of python-debian on jubany

Hi, Now that jubany's on lucid, the system can supply a new enough python-debian package - newer, in fact, than the one in the bzr branch at /srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/scripts/python-debian. Could a Canonical staff member file a RT for me requesting 'apt-get install python-debian' ?

Re: Please file a RT for installation of python-debian on jubany

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/15/2011 10:29 AM, Max Bowsher wrote: Hi, Now that jubany's on lucid, the system can supply a new enough python-debian package - newer, in fact, than the one in the bzr branch at /srv/package-import.canonical.com/new/scripts/python-debian.

Re: packaging guide

On Jul 14, 2011, at 05:26 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: I've been looking over the packaging guide for what needs done to it and issues with UDD it reveals. Thanks very much for your great work on this Jonathan. Daniel asked me to review your branches, which I did, although one of them needs an

Re: Please file a RT for installation of python-debian on jubany

It's done now. -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel

Re: Can we fix apport to stop reporting all upgrade bugs against dpkg?

Hello Raphael, sorry for the very late reply, this got lost in my mailbox. Raphael Hertzog [2011-05-01 9:24 +0200]: Introducing a work-around in the already released apport seems more plausible. What do you think? I created a bug pattern and set http://pad.lv/541595 as the master bug, to

Re: Can we fix apport to stop reporting all upgrade bugs against dpkg?

Hi Martin, On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, Martin Pitt wrote: sorry for the very late reply, this got lost in my mailbox. Heh, I see that didrocks did not forget to ping you :-) Raphael Hertzog [2011-05-01 9:24 +0200]: Introducing a work-around in the already released apport seems more plausible.

Re: Do you use Binary package hint: line in bug description?

On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Francis J. Lacoste wrote: Binary package hint: binarypackagename Is that feature useful to you? I don't find it useful, and frequently edit the bug to remove it. 'Binary package hint is a mysterious term http://launchpad.net/bugs/93630 Eagerly waiting for your ok to

Re: Do you use Binary package hint: line in bug description?

On 06/08/2011 11:52 PM, Francis J. Lacoste wrote: Hello, When user file bugs on the distribution and enter a package name in the widget, Launchpad automatically adds a line to the description with Binary package hint: binarypackagename That binarypackagename actually comes from the last

Re: Leaving the project

Ciao Lorenzo, Am 14.07.2011 12:59, schrieb Lorenzo De Liso: Good luck with the future of the project and thanks for everything. Thanks a lot for all you did for Ubuntu and all the best for you and your future projects. Have a great day, Daniel -- Ubuntu Developer Week: 11th-15th July 2011

Patch Pilot report: 2011-07-15

- https://code.launchpad.net/~amoog/ubuntu/oneiric/strigi/lp-765910/+merge/65380 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libubuntuone/+bug/809460 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xaralx/+bug/756218 reviewed and sponsored -

Ubuntu Developer Summit Sponsorship Open

Hi Everyone, The Ubuntu Developer Summit (http://uds.ubuntu.com/) (UDS) is the most important event in the Ubuntu calendar. It is where we get together to discuss, design, and plan the next version of Ubuntu; in this case the Ubuntu 11.10 release. The next UDS takes place at **The Caribe

Slim down gedit to save space on CD

Seeing that there's a heavy fight for CD space for Oneiric, may I suggest slimming down gedit. Currently gedit as shipped by default looks more like an IDE than a basic editor. It pulls gtksourceview for syntax highlighting and a few plugins which are only needed by very advanced users