bug 819679 - Sync subtitleeditor (universe) 0.39.0 from debian
experimental (main).
Builds fine, ACKd
bug 819774 - Please sync zsnes 1.510+bz2-1 (universe) from Debian
unstable (main)
FTBFS, assigned to reporter, unsubscribed sponsors
gedit-plugin 3.1.2 merge
approved, pushed, uploaded
Bug #8
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 17:46, Clint Byrum wrote:
> I think peoples' time is better spent elsewhere.. but if somebody in
> the community wants to spend time correcting the spelling mistakes,
> our policy is not really clear as to whether or not this is ok.
But beyond just spending their own time,
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 05:29:07 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:06:26 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
Excerpts from Micah Gersten's message of Wed Aug 03 12:55:09 -0700 2011:
> So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file
> description typo fixes for natty:
> https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234
> https://code.launchpad.net/~bo
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 02:34:31PM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 02:01 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA512
> >>
> >> On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> >>> On 08/03/2011 12:50
On 08/03/2011 02:01 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 02:05 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:06:26 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> I think it's rea
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:45:09PM -0400, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> [...]
> Personally, as a member of the DMB, I definitely want to keep having
> live meetings with the applicants.
>
> E-mail can be fine in very specific cases where live IRC meeting can't
> be achieved and should only be something
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 04:06:26 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> >>> My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least f
On 08/03/2011 01:45 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 08/03/2011 04:36 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
On 08/03/2011 12:50 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
>>> wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
is it only
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Chase Douglas
> wrote:
>> I don't think the DMB process is an important piece of community
>> socialization at all. I doubt many people pay attention to it if they
>> don't have a specific need to. There are
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
>> 2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about "Whats a Quorum"
And if you read it, it's not "what's quorum?" We KNOW that. It's 4.
The question was whether having majority-of-the-board-me
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
>> 2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about "Whats a Quorum"
>> 2011-02-14 [2] was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
>> possibly getting lost trying to quickly scan
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:46:55 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:35 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> >> At very least, this issue needs to be fixed. Meetings need to happen at
> >> scheduled times, or be postponed/rescheduled at
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> 2011-06-20 [1] ended in a discussion about "Whats a Quorum"
> 2011-02-14 [2] was postponed, maybe that is what I had seen. I admit to
> possibly getting lost trying to quickly scan the logs.
#1 had quorum just dandy. The applicant didn't get
On 08/03/2011 12:23 PM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
>> wrote:
>>> What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
>>> is it only under specific circumstances?
>>
>> Split votes go t
On 08/03/2011 12:44 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
>>> My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
>>> evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Cre
On Wed, 3 Aug 2011, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> > With no further digging, only looking at
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Logs , 4 out of the last
> > 11 meetings scheduled did not happen. 3 of those were due to lack of
> >
So, there are a couple merge proposals right now for control file
description typo fixes for natty:
https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/oneiric/gnomebaker/fix-for-818364/+merge/70234
https://code.launchpad.net/~bones/ubuntu/natty/radiotray/fix-for-722886/+merge/70107
The package has either be
On 08/03/2011 03:51 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> I think the message isn't that there aren't unforeseen circumstances.
>> It's that they need to be handled in a better fashion. Custom courtesy
>> (where I'm from at least :) says that meetings that are cancelled or
>> postponed have advance notice
On 08/03/2011 12:35 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
>> At very least, this issue needs to be fixed. Meetings need to happen at
>> scheduled times, or be postponed/rescheduled at least 24 hours in advance.
>
> Believe I already said this, but...
>
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 03:04:14 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> > My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
> > evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Create a
> > project (maybe "ubuntu-developer-members
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:30 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
>>> Ok, that's evidence of what's been done in the past, but what is the
>>> policy? Can I do it myself? I'm asking because I seriously would rath
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Scott Moser wrote:
> With no further digging, only looking at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/Logs , 4 out of the last
> 11 meetings scheduled did not happen. 3 of those were due to lack of
> quorum. At least one other meeting not explicitly lis
On 08/03/2011 12:30 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
> wrote:
>> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
>>> wrote:
What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
>>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
>> wrote:
>>> What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
>>> is it only under specific circumstances?
>>
>> Split v
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, Nathan Handler wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Chase Douglas
> wrote:
> > True, but progress sometimes means change. I think this system would
> > work better, and if proven right it could be a model for other boards to
> > adopt. If it's worse, then the DMB can easil
On 08/03/2011 12:14 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
> wrote:
>> What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
>> is it only under specific circumstances?
>
> Split votes go to the mailing list to try to find enough +1s after a
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> What is the policy for email applications? Can anyone apply this way, or
> is it only under specific circumstances?
Split votes go to the mailing list to try to find enough +1s after a meeting.
Board members can email in advance a +1/-1 if th
On 08/03/2011 11:43 AM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Chase Douglas
> wrote:
>> I don't think the DMB process is an important piece of community
>> socialization at all. I doubt many people pay attention to it if they
>> don't have a specific need to. There are much bet
On 08/02/2011 09:33 AM, Chase Douglas wrote:
> My proposal would be to do away with formal meetings, at least for
> evaluating typical applications, and move them to Launchpad. Create a
> project (maybe "ubuntu-developer-membership") and then have people open
> bugs when they have something to brin
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> I don't think the DMB process is an important piece of community
> socialization at all. I doubt many people pay attention to it if they
> don't have a specific need to. There are much better and more important
> social pieces of Ubuntu. I jus
On 08/03/2011 09:18 AM, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 09:33 -0700 schrieb Chase Douglas:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
>> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
>> an equal number
Hi,
Everything is in the title. Have a look at
http://doodle.com/f3v9k6vpycesgm2b
Regards,
Romain
--
kubuntu-devel mailing list
kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-devel
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
> an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
> :(. This led me to think
hi,
Am Dienstag, den 02.08.2011, 09:33 -0700 schrieb Chase Douglas:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I attempted to attend a DMB meeting, but unfortunately only
> two members showed so there wasn't a quorum. I think I've been to about
> an equal number of meetings where quorum has and has not been reached
On Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:37:54 AM Chase Douglas wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 06:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 04:04:31 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
> >> On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington
> >
> > wrot
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Chase Douglas
wrote:
> The issue with the email voting is two-fold:
>
> 1. It's not advertised anywhere. I didn't know it was possible until it
> was mentioned yesterday. This is easy to fix.
> 2. As mentioned yesterday, there's the possibility that applications
>
On 08/02/2011 06:46 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 04:04:31 PM Chase Douglas wrote:
>> On 08/02/2011 12:43 PM, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Bryce Harrington
> wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me. It makes it analogous to other proces
Am Mittwoch, den 03.08.2011, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > Hello Benjamin,
> >
> > Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
> > > +E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers
> > > 0664 != 0644
> >
>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:25:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Benjamin,
>
> Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
> > +E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers
> > 0664 != 0644
>
> This is most likely because in oneiric the standard umask for
> non-system
Hello Benjamin,
Benjamin Drung [2011-07-25 16:56 +0200]:
> +E: control-files-weird-files: control-file-has-bad-permissions triggers 0664
> != 0644
This is most likely because in oneiric the standard umask for
non-system users is 002 now, for users which are in a private user
group. I. e. new fil
44 matches
Mail list logo
