On 12/10/2011 09:36 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 12/10/2011 11:41 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>>
>> If you're going to leave REVU up, you need to make it very clear that
>> it's neglected within the REVU submission interface itself.
>
> The notices up on the website help, but the actual submission
On 12/10/2011 11:41 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
>
> If you're going to leave REVU up, you need to make it very clear that
> it's neglected within the REVU submission interface itself.
The notices up on the website help, but the actual submission interface
for REVU is dput. The revu-hackers may have
On 11/28/2011 10:20 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 08:43 AM, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> Am 14.11.2011 17:36, schrieb Scott Kitterman:
>>> On 11/14/2011 11:21 AM, Allison Randal wrote:
I'll propose a compromise: how about we remove REVU from the
documentation for new packagers, so
== Attendees ==
* Chair: Michael Bienia
* Present: Benjamin Drung, Micah Gersten, Stefano Rivera, Stéphane Graber
== Notes ==
* Action review
* Iain Lane to document package set application process
→ done
* Micah Gersten to ping all packageset teams to get a description we
c
