Excerpts from Mackenzie Morgan's message of Wed Jan 04 07:48:44 -0800 2012:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Why bother encrypting / instead of just /home? We already have /home
> > encryption, which seems to meet the needs of most people.
>
> IIRC, certificates like for
On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 10:48 -0500, Mackenzie Morgan wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > Why bother encrypting / instead of just /home? We already have /home
> > encryption, which seems to meet the needs of most people.
>
> IIRC, certificates like for IPSec and SSL ar
The meeting minutes with full irc log can also be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Server/20120103
== Agenda ==
* Review ACTION points from previous meeting
* No action items
* Precise Development
* Ubuntu Server Team Events
* Weekly Updates & Questions for th
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Phillip Susi wrote:
> Why bother encrypting / instead of just /home? We already have /home
> encryption, which seems to meet the needs of most people.
IIRC, certificates like for IPSec and SSL are stored outside of /home,
and having those compromised is bad news.
On 1/4/2012 1:44 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
And they're asking people to go to brainstorm:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/05/help-bring-disk-encryption-ubuntu-live-cd
What was the reason we aren't doing this already?
Why bother encrypting / instead of just /home? We already have /home
enc
On 01/04/2012 07:44 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
And they're asking people to go to brainstorm:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/05/help-bring-disk-encryption-ubuntu-live-cd
What was the reason we aren't doing this already?
Thanks,
Scott Ritchie
We decided not to do any major changes to Ubiqui
