On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 10:52:44 +0100, Max Bowsher _...@maxb.eu wrote:
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/udd/+bug/990394
Thanks for catching this.
Fwiw it's not normally an issue as it normally takes longer to run
branch-distro.py and re-enable things, and once there has been another
package
Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get things
switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
$ bzr branch ubuntu:precise/debootstrap precise
bzr: ERROR: Revision
{package-imp...@ubuntu.com-2021132053-gkdptiozkkmpd7p4} not present in
On 04/30/2012 10:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get things
switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
$ bzr branch ubuntu:precise/debootstrap precise
bzr: ERROR: Revision
{package-imp...@ubuntu.com-2021132053-gkdptiozkkmpd7p4}
On 30/04/12 18:44, Micah Gersten wrote:
On 04/30/2012 10:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get things
switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
$ bzr branch ubuntu:precise/debootstrap precise
bzr: ERROR: Revision
On 04/30/2012 04:45 PM, Max Bowsher wrote:
On 30/04/12 18:44, Micah Gersten wrote:
On 04/30/2012 10:33 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Now that Quantal is open for development, what do we need to do to get
things
switched over, and UDD all happy-like?
$ bzr branch ubuntu:precise/debootstrap
Hello everybody,
I've been completely overwhelmed by the general reactions to the Ubuntu
12.04 release. It's clear that this was the best Ubuntu release ever.
To get a feel for how people love the work you've all been doing, check out
https://twitter.com/#!/ubuntudev
where I just
On 28.04.2012 00:13, Micah Gersten wrote:
Now that we have the faster i386/amd64 buildds, I'd like to suggest at
least one extra rebuild earlier in the cycle at least for i386/amd64 so
there's time to get these changes upstream.
Around alpha 1 ~ June 7 (archive raw, lots of failures, should
Quantal is now open for development, with syncs from unstable starting shortly.
The development version starts with updated versions of GCC and OpenJDK, some
soname changes (boost, hdf5), and some changes with setting the build flags for
package builds. We are finally targeting Python3 as the
One thing to note: merge-o-matic is not currently operational in a
useful way due to hardware trouble (it's showing data at the moment, but
dating from April; attempting to run MoM causes the system to reboot).
James Troup was looking into this at the end of last week, but it may
take a few days
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 04:24:34PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Matthias Klose [2012-04-30 15:17 +0200]:
Quantal is now open for development, with syncs from unstable starting
shortly.
So we resolved to unstable after all? From the quick discussion last
Friday in #ubuntu-release it was not
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Scott Kitterman wrote:
This debootstrap knows about quantal. It just finished building and should be
available in less than an hour for precise backports.
Could we make debootstrap use distro-info or distro-info-data ?
I really like the idea of maintaining a list of
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 01:39:54AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm therefore currently building all of precise/main in a couple of
amd64 cloud instances with our hack removed from dpkg-buildpackage in
the build chroot, with the intention of checking for any build failures,
but also of
FYI, I have committed a version of a script and a manpage,
purge-old-kernels, to lp:bikeshed:
*
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bikeshed/bikeshed/trunk/view/head:/purge-old-kernels
*
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bikeshed/bikeshed/trunk/view/head:/purge-old-kernels.1
It's based on the logic that
Quantal is now open for development, with syncs from unstable starting shortly.
The development version starts with updated versions of GCC and OpenJDK, some
soname changes (boost, hdf5), and some changes with setting the build flags for
package builds. We are finally targeting Python3 as the
14 matches
Mail list logo