Le 09/01/2013 09:13, Cody A.W. Somerville a écrit :
== PerPackageUploader Applications ==
=== Bjoern Michaelsen for libreoffice ===
LINK: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BjoernMichaelsen/DeveloperApplication
VOTE: For: 2 Against: 1 Undecided: 2
Application was unsuccessful.
Hey DMB people,
I've bee
On Jan 09, 2013, at 09:03 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>IMHO the main obstacle is that UDD does not work well for common use
>cases. I find myself not exactly liking UDD even for the (vast
>majority of) packages where the branches are up to date, mostly
>because its design is a bit upside down: It has
Here are the results of my shift:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/1060262
-> done, removed from the queue
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/806248
-> given some guidance on the unity process for SRUs (cherry-picking
from trunk so that we don't loose branches), unsusc
Barry Warsaw [2013-01-08 14:59 -0500]:
> IMHO, the main obstacle is the success rate of the package importer.
In my experience that doesn't matter. If a package doesn't have a
current UDD branch, then there's always the good old apt-get
source/edit.
IMHO the main obstacle is that UDD does not wor
