On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:16:58PM +0100, Philip Muskovac wrote:
> Let me add that due to
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077116
> (automoc4 crashes in qemu-virtualized armhf)
> Kubuntu doesn't have any *usable* armhf PPA builders right now as KDE
> software
> doesn't compile in qemu.
FWIW,
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 04:53:58PM -0500, Michael Hall wrote:
> 14:00 - 20:00 UTC actually
Right - it got updated for a third time after I posted. I think the
canonical location is http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1303/
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debia
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:34:25PM -0800, Tobin Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 16:52 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Just using 'apt-get dist-upgrade' all the time, or something with closer
> > semantics to that, is better.
>
> Oh, then you've fixed the issue where dist-upgrade removes packag
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 16:52 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:12:34PM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > Long gone are the days where a `apt-get upgrade` has broken my system
> > (knock on wood) and while I do inspect dist-upgrades a little more
> > carefully, they are usually pre
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:13:39PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013, Colin Watson wrote:
> > The latter option (publish immediately, symlink only after passing
> > tests) would be simpler to implement and is probably the most plausible
> > way to do this; after all if you don't publ
Hello Allison,
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:54:39 -0800, Allison Randal wrote:
> - There are a lot of people I really like, who I only see at UDS. I have
> a very real sense of grief at "will I ever see so-and-so again?" It's
> certainly not Canonical's job to pay for my social life. :) But, it's
> impo
Loïc Minier [2013-03-01 12:10 +0100]:
> I don't think we can make any commitment against all of Ubuntu or all of
> main, but we could pick a subset by product and commit to some level of
> API and ABI support for this subset.
I still disagree. A few years ago we heavily promoted quickly+pygtk2
as
Colin Watson [2013-03-01 16:49 +]:
> While I think monthly image releases make sense, I don't personally like
> the notion of monthly updates at all
FWIW, I fully agree, I was just contemplating how we would implement
it in the easiest possible manner should we have to do it at all. I
would re
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 16:31:49 +0100, Rick Spencer
wrote:
= tl;dr =
Ubuntu has an amazing opportunity in the next 7-8 months to deliver a
Phone
OS that will be widely adopted by users and industry while also putting
into place the foundation for a truly converged OS.
To succeed at this we w
