Dmitrijs Ledkovs [2013-03-04 23:08 +]:
> For me the other caveats are lack of documentation look-ups, one has
> to guess how it would be called in C api and look that up and then
> translate to semi-pythonic dot notation, test the gi call in ipython
> and only then use.
> This is hardly rapid d
Hello Evan,
Evan Dandrea [2013-03-04 15:34 +]:
> > "From exceptions to segfaults" is quite a harsh exaggeration.
>
> >> from gi.repository import GdkX11
> >> GdkX11.get_default_xdisplay()
> [1]10593 segmentation fault (core dumped) ipython
>
> >> import gtk
> >> gtk.gdk.display_get_defa
On 4 March 2013 21:29, Phillip Susi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/4/2013 2:58 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
>> However, in the process of this I couldn't help but notice that
>> ureadahead seems fairly abandoned, even though it's still shipping
>> with most (all?)
All the best, Charlie! :-)
I remember working with you on some Xubuntu issues. You were the
leader of the Xubuntu team back then. You're a good guy!
May I suggest an alternative volunteer effort for you? The Xfce
project (which is upstream) is a great way to keep contributing to all
distro's who
On 4 March 2013 15:34, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Evan Dandrea [2013-03-04 11:24 +]:
>> "From exceptions to segfaults" is quite a harsh exaggeration.
>
>>> from gi.repository import GdkX11
>>> GdkX11.get_default_xdisplay()
> [1]10593 segmen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-03-04 07:34 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> "From exceptions to segfaults" is quite a harsh exaggeration.
>
>>> from gi.repository import GdkX11 GdkX11.get_default_xdisplay()
> [1]10593 segmentation fault (core dumped) ipython
>
>>> import gtk
On Monday, March 04, 2013 01:56:43 PM Jono Bacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
> > As long as Canonical doesn't follow their usual practice of patching stuff
> > without upstreaming, then that might be the case. An incompatible Qt5 is
> > just about the worst ca
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> As long as Canonical doesn't follow their usual practice of patching stuff
> without upstreaming, then that might be the case. An incompatible Qt5 is just
> about the worst case scenario.
This seems like a good chance for us to work more c
On Monday, March 04, 2013 01:50:22 PM Jono Bacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >
> > Projecting out a year or two, I'm personally starting to run short of
> > reasons
> > why a non-Unity desktop flavor of
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> Projecting out a year or two, I'm personally starting to run short of
> reasons
> why a non-Unity desktop flavor of Ubuntu makes sense as a value proposition.
> I
> can probably build a
On Monday, March 04, 2013 03:35:42 PM Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
> +AD4 Projecting out a year or two, I'm personally starting to run short of
> reasons +AD4 why a non-Unity desktop flavor of Ubuntu makes sense as a
> value proposition. I +AD4 ca
On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 15:35 -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Projecting out a year or two, I'm personally starting to run short of reasons
> why a non-Unity desktop flavor of Ubuntu makes sense as a value proposition.
> I
> can probably build a current KDE + Debian Wheezy derivative with less w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/4/2013 2:58 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote:
> However, in the process of this I couldn't help but notice that
> ureadahead seems fairly abandoned, even though it's still shipping
> with most (all?) versions of Ubuntu. The main project on LP hasn't
> be
As the schematics are still being laid out I want to voice my thoughts
on application access to resources . You have surely considered the
subject and it is mentioned in the Wiki texts , but there must be a big
emphasis on it , since in order to have real security every app/service
should be r
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 03:35:21PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, March 04, 2013 11:45:57 AM Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:39:36PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Monday, March 04, 2013 05:46:54 PM Oliver Ries wrote:
> citizens in the long run. Also, one
On 04/03/13 22:37, Charlie Kravetz wrote:
> After much thinking and consideration, I am resigning from all Ubuntu
> related activities. I can no longer say I agree with most of the
> decisions being made by Canonical. While I wish this distribution all
> the best, I can not consider myself of somet
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:42:30PM -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On 3/3/13 4:54 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Nicolas Delvaux wrote:
> >>On Fri, 2013-03-02 at 09:32 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> >>>I'm surprised, because when I hunt around for people talking ab
On 3/3/13 4:54 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:36:45AM +0100, Nicolas Delvaux wrote:
On Fri, 2013-03-02 at 09:32 +, Colin Watson wrote:
I'm surprised, because when I hunt around for people talking about
their experiences running raring I've generally found them favourably
After much thinking and consideration, I am resigning from all Ubuntu
related activities. I can no longer say I agree with most of the
decisions being made by Canonical. While I wish this distribution all
the best, I can not consider myself of something that I am no longer
finding expresses my idea
On Monday, March 04, 2013 11:45:57 AM Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:39:36PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Monday, March 04, 2013 05:46:54 PM Oliver Ries wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I wanted to give you a quick heads up regarding Unity in preparation of
> > > this wee
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:39:36PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, March 04, 2013 05:46:54 PM Oliver Ries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to give you a quick heads up regarding Unity in preparation of
> > this weeks UDS.
> >
> > The traction that Ubuntu Touch is creating is great and t
On Monday, March 04, 2013 05:46:54 PM Oliver Ries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to give you a quick heads up regarding Unity in preparation of
> this weeks UDS.
>
> The traction that Ubuntu Touch is creating is great and the team is
> happy with where this is leading us. However, in order to implemen
Hi,
I wanted to give you a quick heads up regarding Unity in preparation of
this weeks UDS.
The traction that Ubuntu Touch is creating is great and the team is
happy with where this is leading us. However, in order to implement the
vision of converged devices, some changes to our Display Stack ar
Thank you all.
Are there badge guidelines? like:
https://developer.android.com/distribute/googleplay/promote/brand.html
https://developer.apple.com/appstore/AppStoreMarketingGuidelines.pdf
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://list
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Jono Bacon wrote:
> Agreed. Unfortunately its too late to adjust this for the event
> beginning tomorrow, but we will definitely include breaks at the next
> UDS in May. I recommend for this one attendees coordinate breaks
> themselves (e.g. for session leaders to p
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> I'd been wondering that too. Contrary to popular belief, developers
> surely aren't robots who can be continuously productive without
> downtime, particularly in what may be stressful discussions involving
> robust debate. Some kind of break
On 4 March 2013 08:29, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> As title.
>
Do you mean "Download for Ubuntu" button?!
http://www.jorgecastro.org/2012/08/07/easier-installation-for-everyone-with-the-ubuntu-button/
Regards,
Dmitrijs.
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/04/2013 10:12 AM, Dave Morley wrote:
> On 04/03/13 08:29, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
>> As title.
>
> Have a look at https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat and search for the app.
>
> That will give you a clue as to what you can do.
>
>
If you want an image,
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Evan Dandrea [2013-03-04 11:24 +]:
>> If we're committed to leaving ourselves the option to change the
>> entire development stack ever year, we won't have very many high
>> quality developers or applications on our platform. Could we not
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/03/13 08:29, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> As title.
>
Have a look at https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat and search for the app.
That will give you a clue as to what you can do.
- --
You make it, I'll break it!
I love my job :)
http://www.ubuntu.com
http://w
Hi Jonathan
> I'd suppose this, we shouldn't be afraid to buy things for people who have a
> record of helping Kubuntu in the expectation they will work out what it takes
> to get Kubuntu onto the device. I'd like a final price before giving a final
> say so however.
Total cost ( Including s
As title.
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel
As a recent arrival on this list - so far it seems it is more about dev
policy than working contributed hacks into the code base?!?
Regardless the contribution I am interested in preparing, is to repair some
slightly borked SNMP mibs that I have detected could be improved in the
distribution.
Is
Hi everyone,
We've had 3 submissions for plenaries so far, so there's room for one
more, and we have _plenty_ of room for lightning talks.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UDS-1303/Plenaries
Today's your last chance!
--
Jorge Castro
Canonical Ltd.
http://juju.ubuntu.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ub
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:26:49AM +, Victor Palau wrote:
> On 28/02/13 23:07, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > I think this would be a valid solution; one thing to keep in mind with
> > this approach that security updates would be built based on some version
> > of the rolling release and so users of ol
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013, Philipp Kern wrote:
> am Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:42:03AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > I'm not intimate with the costs needed on the archive side when opening
> > a new series, so can't go in details about these, but I suppose it
> > ranges from creating new buildd
Loïc,
am Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:42:03AM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> I'm not intimate with the costs needed on the archive side when opening
> a new series, so can't go in details about these, but I suppose it
> ranges from creating new buildd chroots, updating a bunch of scripts,
> usi
Evan Dandrea [2013-03-04 11:24 +]:
> If we're committed to leaving ourselves the option to change the
> entire development stack ever year, we won't have very many high
> quality developers or applications on our platform. Could we not
> instead say, "enough is enough" and commit ourselves to p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/13 03:04, Michael Hall wrote:
>
> On 02/28/2013 04:55 PM, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> > That's a worst-case scenario for Ubuntu as a platform. The type of
> > users most likely to install applications, not doing so, because
> > they're usin
On 28/02/13 23:07, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013, Alex Chiang wrote:
>> If you want to avoid the daily grind, press the close button when
>> update-manager fires. Or set the 'check for updates' frequency to
>> monthly. I think the intended audience for monthly images could
>> handle th
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Loïc Minier [2013-03-01 12:10 +0100]:
>> I don't think we can make any commitment against all of Ubuntu or all of
>> main, but we could pick a subset by product and commit to some level of
>> API and ABI support for this subset.
>
> I still disa
Hi,
Rick Spencer wrote:
> ... rolling releases ...
As the LibreOffice maintainer I am very happy to hear this, for a set of
reasons, but since so many have already been covered, let me just focus on the
two most essential:
- while the upstream release plan was explicitly crafted to arrive with a
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013, Robert Collins wrote:
> > source.list changes from one monthly to the next. Launchpad series are
> > in too many places and would be too expensive to create/update monthly
>
> I'd like to challenge that. Currently LP series happen every 6 months.
> Monthly is only 6 times th
Michael,
am Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 10:48:21AM -0500 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Does Zynga have to provide a different version of their games for each
> different version of Android they support, or does Android give them
> backwards-compatibility so that they can target 2.2 but still run on
>
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Loïc Minier [2013-03-01 12:10 +0100]:
> > I don't think we can make any commitment against all of Ubuntu or all of
> > main, but we could pick a subset by product and commit to some level of
> > API and ABI support for this subset.
>
> I still disagree. A
45 matches
Mail list logo
