On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 09:45 -0700, James Woodburn wrote:
Thanks Ralf - have forwarded the info to Jules :)
Thank you :)
Linux does need more professional developers. Providing packages for
Ubuntu only IMO isn't a good choice for pro-audio. However, if you
prefer Ubuntu only, take care to be
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 09:45 -0700, James Woodburn wrote:
Thanks Ralf - have forwarded the info to Jules :)
Thank you :)
Linux does need more professional developers. Providing packages for
Ubuntu only IMO isn't
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@alice-dsl.netwrote:
Hi Mike,
it's a proprietary DAW, somebody on LAU posted the link. If it's not
okay to recommend to get in contact with Ubuntu Studio devel, I'm sorry.
I don't know if this is good or bad software and I don't know
Stéphane Graber [2013-05-14 15:44 -0400]:
So I'd much prefer we stick to something that's been working rather well
for all these years and let other people do the experiments with that stuff.
Fair enough. I forward-ported the old rules generators to the current
202 package. I tested it in a VM
Hi,
during my thoughts about the printing stack for Ubuntu Touch [1] I came
to the conclusion that printing needs a PDF renderer to turn incoming
PDF into the printer's language (PWG Raster, PostScript, PCL, ...) but a
PDF renderer needs already to be on a mobile device to make it able to
display
hi,
On Fr, 2013-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
Hi,
during my thoughts about the printing stack for Ubuntu Touch [1] I came
to the conclusion that printing needs a PDF renderer to turn incoming
PDF into the printer's language (PWG Raster, PostScript, PCL, ...) but a
PDF renderer
Hi Till,
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 01:25:12PM +0200, Till Kamppeter wrote:
So Ghostscript is out of the question here as it is large and the PDF
interpreter is written in PostScript. Poppler has the advantage of
having a long history and so it should deal best with quirky files.
MuPDF is
