Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-15 Thread Ma Xiaojun
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: > As explained various times: GNOME OS is not about replacing > distributions. It is providing a VM which can be used for developers as > well as something which can be used for testing. > > E.g. in a bugreport: > Is it fixed in this VM? Recent

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-15 Thread Jono Bacon
Hi Olav, On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > Primary focus for GNOME will be Wayland. There are a few things that > Wayland does not support that X did support. This will result in having > to do things differently. See e.g. the various forms of 'deprecate' is > mentioned on h

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-15 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:51:29PM -0700, Jono Bacon wrote: > I suspect X support for GNOME will be around for a while primarily so Red > Hat can continue to serve their customers. We should definitely ensure the > GNOME community are invited to the Mir discussions moving forward, as are > the KDE/

Re: non-Unity flavours and Mir

2013-06-15 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:47:43PM +0800, Ma Xiaojun wrote: > GNOME, well, the future is GNOME OS, period. As explained various times: GNOME OS is not about replacing distributions. It is providing a VM which can be used for developers as well as something which can be used for testing. E.g. in a