Patch pilot report 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Barry Warsaw
41 at start * LP: #1258707 (sync apr-util 1.5.3-1) Already sync'd to trusty - closed bug. * LP: #1258692 (sync python-happybase 0.7-1) Already sync'd to trusty - closed bug * LP: #1258690 (sync libnl3 3.2.21-1) Already sync'd to trusty - closed bug * LP: #1258687 (sync libarchive 3.1.

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Phillip Susi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/10/2013 11:19 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:35:40AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Colin Watson wrote: >>> I think it's helpful for user-facing documentation for it to >>> be consistently installed by def

Minutes from the Ubuntu Kernel Team meeting, 2013-12-10

2013-12-10 Thread Joseph Salisbury
= Meeting Minutes = [[http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2013/12/10/%23ubuntu-meeting.txt|IRC Log of the meeting.]] [[http://voices.canonical.com/kernelteam|Meeting minutes.]] == Agenda == [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting#Tues, 10 Dec, 2013|20131210 Meeting Agenda]] === ARM Status

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Scott Moser
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:35:40AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I think it's helpful for user-facing documentation for it to be > > > consistently installed by default, especially since a system with memory

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:35:40AM -0500, Scott Moser wrote: > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Colin Watson wrote: > > I think it's helpful for user-facing documentation for it to be > > consistently installed by default, especially since a system with memory > > integrity problems may have trouble installing

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 12/10/2013 08:43 AM, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:50:02AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >> Colin, it looks like you were the only person to have ever touched this >> package in the seeds - and that only to move it from minimal to standard. >> Do you think we can move memtest8

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Scott Moser
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:50:02AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Colin, it looks like you were the only person to have ever touched this > > package in the seeds - and that only to move it from minimal to standard. > > Do you think we can move memtest8

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:50:02AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Colin, it looks like you were the only person to have ever touched this > package in the seeds - and that only to move it from minimal to standard. > Do you think we can move memtest86+ somewhere higher in the stack, so that > it's

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Scott Moser
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:47:39PM -0500, Scott Moser wrote: > > Hey all, > > Looking at the contents of the cloud images, memtest86+ is one of the > > packages that I questioned the necessity of in a cloud image. > > That is in the cloud images as

Re: is memtest86+ useful in ubuntu-standard ?

2013-12-10 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:47:39PM -0500, Scott Moser wrote: > Hey all, > Looking at the contents of the cloud images, memtest86+ is one of the > packages that I questioned the necessity of in a cloud image. > That is in the cloud images as cloud images are ubuntu-server and > ubuntu-standard t