On Jan 22, 2016 11:52 AM, "Colin Watson" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:09:10AM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> > According to the 502 servers surveyed, 97.2% use less than 1.5 GB of
> > /tmp.
>
> I'm not expressing any particular view on the overall topic either way
> here, but for the sak
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 09:09:10AM -0600, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
> According to the 502 servers surveyed, 97.2% use less than 1.5 GB of
> /tmp.
I'm not expressing any particular view on the overall topic either way
here, but for the sake of accuracy, I believe that that is not in fact
what the dat
Hello,
I've been working on merging[1] strongswan from Debian into Ubuntu for
Xenial. We've not completed a merge with Debian for some time (Feb 19,
2014 was the last time). Ubuntu has been using version 5.1.2 since then
but Debian and upstream have moved on. Ubuntu has collected a large delta
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov [2016-01-21 11:31 +]:
>> Is it just me, or did the RFC asks about cloud-images alone, and we
>> are diverging to discussing all the things, and all the form factors,
>> and all the installation types.
>
> That's true, so
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Robie Basak [2016-01-21 9:56 +]:
>> I think we need a single canonical (small c) answer. Let's say that I'm
>> an upstream maintainer of a project that currently uses large amounts of
>> space in /tmp (say debdiff on kernel sources, for ex
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Is it just me, or did the RFC asks about cloud-images alone, and we
> are diverging to discussing all the things, and all the form factors,
> and all the installation types.
>
> Certainly it should be easy to use tmp on tpmfs with cloud
