I managed to do some piloting today, mostly looking at syncs and merges. Of
course syncpackages won't work yet but as Colin says elsewhere it shouldn't be
too much longer before Debian imports are working again. For all the pure
syncs, I've ensured that they build on my local Xenial, I've assigne
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 03:46:49PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2016, at 09:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> >This change has caused quite a bit of fallout, both in Debian and Ubuntu
> >(and quite probably elsewhere). On the whole I approve of the direction
> >of the changes so haven't been
Hi Colin,
On Mar 18, 2016, at 09:19 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>This change has caused quite a bit of fallout, both in Debian and Ubuntu
>(and quite probably elsewhere). On the whole I approve of the direction
>of the changes so haven't been lobbying to have them reversed, although
>the timing is a
Hello,
I'm sending this e-mail on behalf of the current Edubuntu project
leaders, Jonathan Carter and myself.
Jonathan and I have both been involved in Edubuntu for a long time
(almost 10 years for Jonathan and almost 9 for me). We were at first
just contributors, then became council members and
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 07:13:34PM +0100, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> […]
> sni-qt can definitely be a Recommends of libqtgui4, it is useful on other
> desktops too (i.e. Plasma or Xubuntu).
Please do this.
>
> fcitx-frontend-qt4: I don't think it has anything Unity-specific, and
> also most of th
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> The only reason the Xenial Ubuntu Desktop iso currently has qt4 still
> included is because the "integration components for softwares using that
> toolkit" are Recommends (appmenu-qt, sni-qt, fcitx-frontend-qt4).
>
> The def
