Re: ANN: DNS resolver changes in yakkety

2016-06-03 Thread Seth Arnold
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > yesterday I landed [1] in Yakkety which changes how DNS resolution > works -- i. e. how names like "www.ubuntu.com" get translated to an IP > address like 1.2.3.4. > Now DNS resolution goes via a new "libnss-resolve" NSS module which

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 02:00:04AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > There are two ways to make a GLES-enabled Qt stack available on arm64; the > > armhf way (build Qt exclusively for GLES), or the x86 way (build alternative > > stacks for both GL and GLES). > > Which we should pursue depends on

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04.06.2016 00:25, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:56:14PM -0500, Kevin Gunn wrote: >>> Ubuntu supports a growing number of ARM servers that have PCIe slots, >>> so external GPUs can be added. CUDA is supported on those platforms >>> upstream: >>>

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 03:56:14PM -0500, Kevin Gunn wrote: > > Ubuntu supports a growing number of ARM servers that have PCIe slots, > > so external GPUs can be added. CUDA is supported on those platforms > > upstream: > > https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-toolkit-65 > > And I do know there are

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Dann Frazier
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:53PM -0600, Dann Frazier wrote: >> [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: >> > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Kevin Gunn
On Friday, June 3, 2016, Dann Frazier wrote: > [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn > wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose >

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:03:53PM -0600, Dann Frazier wrote: > [ Reorganized to use inline replies ] > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Dann Frazier
[ Reorganized to use inline replies ] On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Kevin Gunn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> >> LP: #1586026 asks for the removal of binary packages on arm64 which cannot >> be >> built with OpenGL

Re: OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Kevin Gunn
hey Matthias, after reading the bug, it's implied the binaries being asked for removal were somehow built with gl (possibly sw implementation of gl?)please cmiiaw as to the request, never say never, but at least i've never seen an arm chipset in the wild with a gl enabled gpu (like the bug

OpenGL to OpenGL ES change on arm64?

2016-06-03 Thread Matthias Klose
LP: #1586026 asks for the removal of binary packages on arm64 which cannot be built with OpenGL ES. Do we really have to cripple an architecture like this? I don't see any discussion about this. How does this affect things like GPU accelerators and CUDA aware packages? Matthias --

Re: the right to make a difference

2016-06-03 Thread Sam Bull
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 20:39 +0200, Xen wrote: > > This exactly has happened many times. If you take a proprietary > > piece > > of software, make changes and resell it (breaking the license > > agreement > > you received it under), then the original authors are perfectly in > > their rights to