On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:37 AM Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:33:24PM +, Robert Ancell wrote:
> > It may be worth considering disabling i386 builds for individual packages
> > to reduce the support costs. That way the core packages can build for
>
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 09:33:24PM +, Robert Ancell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:41 AM Steve Langasek
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 08:18:54AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> > > Excuse the top posting, only have a phone available.
> >
> > >
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:41 AM Steve Langasek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 08:18:54AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> > Excuse the top posting, only have a phone available.
>
> > Ubuntu MATE works with a few organisations around the world, one in my
> own
> >
Hi!
On 2016-06-29 21:23, Jóhann Örn Geirdal wrote:
> I also suggest to make the orange stronger!
Not sure what you mean by "stronger", but in my terminology ubuntustudio
orange is stronger, and the one you are using is brighter.
The orange you are using is: #FF8D00
The orange ubuntustudio is
Hi Bryan,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:02:02AM -0400, Bryan Quigley wrote:
> I'll work on creating a new public survey (and possibly a separate
> partner/customer one).
> Based on my previous one, my biggest concerns were for Lubuntu/Xubuntu.
> With recent memory testing [1] it's even more true
Hello everyone,
I am having some issues collecting crashed from segfaults. I was told to come
here after the ubuntu-server mailing list couldn't help me. I am seeing
segfaults in mdadm constantly. We are running ubuntu-server 14.04 with
3.13.0-88-generic kernal and mdadm version
On 29.06.2016 15:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
> laptops, but I would not be surprised if
On 29.06.2016 15:37, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
> laptops, but I would not be surprised if
I also suggest to make the orange stronger!
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Jóhann Örn Geirdal <
johann.orn.geir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here I have proposal to new icons in studio default apps. Have in mynd
> that some Logos are better designed than others for each app.
>
Here I have proposal to new icons in studio default apps. Have in mynd that
some Logos are better designed than others for each app.
http://geirdal.is/index.php/studio-0
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:01 PM, C. F. Howlett
wrote:
> I know I have been very quiet of late. My
Hi Martin,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 08:18:54AM +0100, Martin Wimpress wrote:
> Excuse the top posting, only have a phone available.
> Ubuntu MATE works with a few organisations around the world, one in my own
> country, that refurbish donated computers, install them with Ubuntu MATE
> and give
Let's also factor in flavors like Lubuntu that aim to use very minimal
resources and that have the ability to run with ~ 300 MB of RAM on an
i386 machine. While I understand modern applications are removing i386
support, we have a nice application base for Lubuntu for both LXDE and
LXQt that
hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.06.2016, 14:37 +0100 schrieb Mark Shuttleworth:
> Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely
> used
> for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
> targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
> laptops, but I
Greetings,
Let's also factor in flavors like Lubuntu that aim to use very minimal
resources and that have the ability to run with ~ 300 MB of RAM on an
i386 machine. While I understand modern applications are removing i386
support, we have a nice application base for Lubuntu for both LXDE and
Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
laptops, but I would not be surprised if 32-bit x86 is used in small
'embedded' environments.
Folks, I think we need to understand whether i386 won't be widely used
for very small IoT devices and hence be important for developers
targeting those. I accept i386 i no longer relevant for PC's and
laptops, but I would not be surprised if 32-bit x86 is used in small
'embedded' environments.
I know I have been very quiet of late. My Dell M3800 Developer Edition
crashed. Getting support in a new country, Japan, has proven a bitoif a
challenge. As my need was immediate, I was "forced" to acquire a new device.
Now coming at you live from a Mac Air with Ubuntu in virtual box
Hi,
Excuse the top posting, only have a phone available.
Ubuntu MATE works with a few organisations around the world, one in my own
country, that refurbish donated computers, install them with Ubuntu MATE
and give (or sell them for next to nothing) to schools, disadvantaged
families and people
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 4:08 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> I propose that 16.04 LTS should be the last release with i386 support.
> That way we don't leave anyone with a choice of (a) keep running
> known-insecure 17.10 in 2018 or (b) figure out how to do a downgrade
> back
Hi Dimitri,
I'll work on creating a new public survey (and possibly a separate
partner/customer one).
Based on my previous one, my biggest concerns were for Lubuntu/Xubuntu.
With recent memory testing [1] it's even more true for Lubuntu. (And if
you only <512 MB of Ram - Docker, ZFS and system
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Let me resurrect this thread. In the context of what we should be
> doing in 18.04 and what to do between now and then.
Thanks for raising this again; it'd be nice to have a plan in place before
we wind up in a difficult
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 02:54:13PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Let me resurrect this thread. In the context of what we should be
> doing in 18.04 and what to do between now and then.
Thanks for raising this again; it'd be nice to have a plan in place before
we wind up in a difficult
== Minutes ==
=== Review ACTION points from previous meeting ===
The discussion about "Review ACTION points from previous meeting" started
at 16:02.
No ACTION points
=== Yakkety Development ===
The discussion about "Yakkety Development" started at 16:03.
nacc reported that the php cleanups
23 matches
Mail list logo