On Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:44:42 PM Martin Pitt wrote:
> Steve Langasek [2018-02-16 11:12 -0800]:
...
> > I think the network-online.target is the better thing to key on.
>
> I still don't like that much, though:
> - there is no requirement that this actually gets "implemented" or even
>
Steve Langasek [2018-02-16 11:12 -0800]:
> > > [ -n "$(ip route show to 0/0)" ]
>
> > This is better though, and works too. Please take a look at the attached
> > patch. Thanks! :-)
>
> Actually no, this is racy, because the route comes up before DNS resolution
> is in place.
I'm not actually
Hello all,
Iain Lane [2018-02-16 11:52 +]:
> > I wouldn't pick on any of these: network-online.target is a sloppily defined
> > shim for SysV init backwards compatibility, and may not ever get started (in
> > fact, that's the goal ☺); and the container might not use networkd, so I
> > wouldn't
