Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

Please stop. "Lawyering" on this list is pointless and will not get us anywhere. "I think this would be compliant" and "I think this would not be compliant" is meaningless when coming from a bunch of random engineers. Give Canonical some credit. They're not going to go ahead with something that

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

Please stop. "Lawyering" on this list is pointless and will not get us anywhere. "I think this would be compliant" and "I think this would not be compliant" is meaningless when coming from a bunch of random engineers. Give Canonical some credit. They're not going to go ahead with something that

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

On 7 March 2018 at 11:46, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > What proposed collected data do you think should be considered > personal data for GPDR purposes? I am a long way from being an expert on this, and the more I research the more the ground seems to shift. You would need to seek

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

On 07/03/18 20:43, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Notably, in the very first email in this thread, Will Cooke > specifically said IP addresses will never be stored with this data. That doesn't mean it's not collected and so can be ignored. The "collected" data must be "processed" to remove the IP address

Re: More diagnostics data from desktop

(cross-posting because ubuntu-devel is moderated and this may not reach that list) On 07/03/18 11:46, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > What proposed collected data do you think should be considered > personal data for GPDR purposes? > "What constitutes personal data? "Any information related to a natural