On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 13:37, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:31:40AM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> > On the face of it, the package is buggy. tmpfiles configs are processed
> by
> > systemd, the package depends on the tmpfiles config being processed -> it
> > should Depend
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:31:40AM +1300, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote:
> On the face of it, the package is buggy. tmpfiles configs are processed by
> systemd, the package depends on the tmpfiles config being processed -> it
> should Depend: on systemd. This is not a path forward to having it work in
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 21:34, Christian Ehrhardt <
christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> There is a bug [1] showcasing an issue failing in a docker container as
> tmpfiles.d there does nothing.
>
> On 6th of December I already wrote to ubuntu-server as part of my daily
> bug duties and
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 01:10:41PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 06:53:06AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > Dimitri, I don't know enough about sponsorship to know if this is
> > a request for sponsorship, but previously Debian did package
> > Sugar, and in consequence Ubuntu
Hi,
There is a bug [1] showcasing an issue failing in a docker container as
tmpfiles.d there does nothing.
On 6th of December I already wrote to ubuntu-server as part of my daily bug
duties and subscribed people to the bug. Not much happened since then, a
few small IRC exchanges and the Debian ini
