Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

2021-07-30 Thread Iain Lane
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 09:46:37PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > FTR, I don't feel as strongly as Robie seems to, but I agree that the > previous team should be emptied from Launchpad. I do too, to be honest. Now that the backporters team is reconstituted as a result of this thread, I think it

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

2021-07-30 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
FTR, I don't feel as strongly as Robie seems to, but I agree that the previous team should be emptied from Launchpad. On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 6:11 PM Robie Basak wrote: > > Hi Iain, > > Perhaps I see the situation differently from you. From my perspective, > this is an extraordinary intervention

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

2021-07-30 Thread Robie Basak
Hi Iain, Perhaps I see the situation differently from you. From my perspective, this is an extraordinary intervention "from above" by consensus from Ubuntu developers. The backporters team has been unable to act for an extended period of time, and when threatened with closure, nobody from the team

Re: Plan to reform the Ubuntu Backporters Team [was: Proposal: sunset the backports pockets]

2021-07-30 Thread Iain Lane
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 03:20:45PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > > 2) Administrative changes to ~ubuntu-backporters > > - I don't see any public documentation on an existing process for > > membership changes to ~ubuntu-backporters, so I assume your proposal > > along with the disussion here is enoug