Tooling: I don't know what others do already, but for bulk no-change
rebuild uploads I left behind some of my usual one liners and put
together a couple of quick tools:
prep-rebuild: given a list of source packages, automate fetching,
bumping the changelog and preparing the upload. This leaves a
Hey Brian,
I noticed that upload and I'm curious about the motivation. It's really
early in the cycle and we will get bluez updates and time for archive
rebuilds later on so I guess the aim is not to get packages built with a
new LTO by release time. Did we have a buggy LTO version in the
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 12:06:46PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am concerned that the excuses page is ignoring that webkit2gtk
> 2.36.1-1 caused an autopkgtest regression for devhelp.
>
> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/devhelp/kinetic/amd64
>
Hi,
I am concerned that the excuses page is ignoring that webkit2gtk
2.36.1-1 caused an autopkgtest regression for devhelp.
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/d/devhelp/kinetic/amd64
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
The regression was
Xubuntu will be participating in the 22.10 cycle. Thanks for checking in!
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:56 PM Dani Llewellyn
wrote:
> I'm not certain, but I believe Martin's address is
> flexiondot...@ubuntu.com
>
> Dani.
>
> On Wed, 11 May 2022 at 11:09, David Mohammed
> wrote:
>
>> Graham,
>>
>>
Hey Brian,
Le 12/05/2022 à 22:38, Brian Murray a écrit :
Keeping in mind that a crash bucket would still indicate
that old release and package version were affected are there any
objections to this change in data retention?
Would that include the details of the 'number of report by version on
I am digging deep into the world of Ubuntu development and am trying to
make sure my alpha and beta testing is as effective as possible. I also
don't want to cash out an arm and a leg for expensive software to do so.
I've been using virt-manager (QEMU/KVM) for testing on virtual machines,
and
