On Sat, 15 Jun 2024 at 10:46, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
Hi Benjamin,
> I just uploaded dpkg 1.22.6ubuntu11 to Ubuntu oracular. This version
> enables ELF packaging metadata via dpkg-buildflags by default. ELF
> objects will record the spec https://systemd.io/ELF_PACKAGE_METADATA/
Last week I did my +1 maintenance shift. I got sick on Wednesday and
had to take Thursday and Friday off, which impacted the amount of work I
was able to do.
* pytorch
- Athos had already done an initial investigation and left his
findings on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/py
Thank you very much, Simon !!
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:46 AM Simon Chopin
wrote:
> Hi Miriam,
>
> On lun. 17 juin 2024 10:29:57, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote:
> > (Sorry, I sent incomplete)
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay... I was waiting for the resolution
> > (reviews/acce
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 01:03:56PM +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> In
> Ubuntu's case (and Debian's), that's possible with the name, version and
> os fields only, without ambiguity.
It just occurred to me that in Debian's case there are bin
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 01:37:22PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> The implementation maps VERSION_ID from /etc/os-release to the osVersion
> key. Do you suggest to use VERSION_CODENAME from /etc/os-release
> instead?
Yes. That seems like the closest thing we have that would be suitable.
> The spe
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 12:05 +0100, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:56:12PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > It is communicated directly at archive opening, when we upload the
> > base-files containing the os-release saying that:
> >
> > $ grep 24.10 /etc/os-release
> > VERSIO
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 12:56:12PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> It is communicated directly at archive opening, when we upload the
> base-files containing the os-release saying that:
>
> $ grep 24.10 /etc/os-release
> VERSION_ID="24.10"
> VERSION="24.10 (Oracular Oriole)"
>
> I believe it
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 11:20:48AM GMT, Robie Basak wrote:
> Thank you for working on this! It looks like it will be useful to have
> that metadata there.
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:46:15AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> > Packaging Metadata:
> > {"type":"deb","os":"ubuntu","osVersion":"2
Thank you for working on this! It looks like it will be useful to have
that metadata there.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 12:46:15AM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Packaging Metadata:
> {"type":"deb","os":"ubuntu","osVersion":"24.10","name":"chaos-marmosets","version":"0.2.0-1","architecture":"amd6
Hi Miriam,
On lun. 17 juin 2024 10:29:57, Miriam Espana Acebal wrote:
> (Sorry, I sent incomplete)
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Sorry for the delay... I was waiting for the resolution
> (reviews/acceptance) of some of the tasks I did
> (learning also .
> As Athos commented, I shadowed him on the last
(Sorry, I sent incomplete)
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the delay... I was waiting for the resolution
(reviews/acceptance) of some of the tasks I did
(learning also .
As Athos commented, I shadowed him on the last days of his shift rotation
(thanks, Athos! It was a pleasure).
These are the fixes I
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the delay... I was waiting for the resolution
(reviews/acceptance) of some of the tasks I did.
As Athos commented, I shadowed him on the last days of his shift rotation
(thanks, Athos!).
These are the fixes I made:
* python-chemspipy: A FTBFS: when tests were running,
12 matches
Mail list logo
