Re: ubuntu-devel should be the center of ubuntu development

2015-01-10 Thread Mike Carifio
On 01/10/2015 01:58 AM, Jorge O. Castro wrote: Having falling victim to "it's so easy to just post on G+" syndrome just like everyone else, I think we should fix this. Developers are obviously not going to "just update your blog", should we look at some sort of way of integrating social network

Re: reflecting on first UDS session on "rolling releases"

2013-03-07 Thread Mike Carifio
Proposals like moving to a rolling release are an attempt to evolve our existing processes to new realities and requirements, but I think we need to go one step farther and question why we are so tied to our distro model, where apps and platform are tightly bound. The convenience of "one-stop sh

Re: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide

2013-01-08 Thread Mike Carifio
On 12/18/2012 05:48 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Barry Warsaw wrote: > >> On Dec 17, 2012, at 07:52 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> >>> UDD is not mature or reliable enough to be presented to new users as >> "the" >>> way to do packaging for Ubuntu. I think the current guide is fatally >> flawed >>

Re: Styles of Packaging

2012-12-18 Thread Mike Carifio
On 12/18/2012 01:16 AM, Emmet Hikory wrote: > Mike Carifio wrote: >> On 12/17/2012 08:11 PM, Emmet Hikory wrote: >> Where this is understandably annoying for the application developer >> is that the recommendation is subject to change over time, as newer >> tools are dev

Re: Deprecating the wiki-based Packaging Guide

2012-12-17 Thread Mike Carifio
On 12/17/2012 08:11 PM, Emmet Hikory wrote: > Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Benjamin Drung wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 17.12.2012, 16:01 -0500 schrieb Andrew Starr-Bochicchio: 1) Send a last-call anouncement to ubuntu-devel requesting bug reports about