-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/22/2014 08:39 AM, Kangarooo wrote:
> If compeling reason to not release then it would be- theres no
> compeling reason to do so. Well now since Hearthbleed bug theres
> one compeling reason to do one more point release to make year 2012
> Ubunt
If compeling reason to not release then it would be- theres no compeling
reason to do so.
Well now since Hearthbleed bug theres one compeling reason to do one more
point release to make year 2012 Ubuntu version complete for future
generations (or for time until its released to till its LTS ends)
He
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/02/14 18:00, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
[...]
> Providing a 12.04.5 point release will add no additional
> maintenance burden upon teams supporting enablement stacks in
> Precise. It would require some extra effort on part of the
> Canonical Found
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a
> newer
> > kernel and X stack by default for hardware enablement purposes.
> > Maintainers of these ena
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a newer
> kernel and X stack by default for hardware enablement purposes.
> Maintainers of these enablement stacks have agreed to support these until
> a Trusty bas
On Friday, February 07, 2014 20:28:55 Stéphane Graber wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > > With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of
> > > having a
> > > 12.04.5 p
On 08/02/2014 03:28, Stéphane Graber wrote:
>> For the record, this has the Foundations Team's support as well
>> (we've already discussed the resourcing considerations). So
>> unless someone knows of a reason why we *shouldn't* go ahead with
>> this, I think the main question here is whether the
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:24:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> > 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
> > As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point re
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
> As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a newer
> kernel and X stack by default for hardw
On 07/02/14 19:33, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Michael Kellat
wrote:
FYI
How does this align with our planning?
If it goes as smoothly as past point releases, it would require us to
do testing of the ISOs but I don't think much else (unless we wan
;>
>>>> How does this align with our planning?
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Michael Kellat
>>>> In the basement cafeteria on lunch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>
Kellat
>>> In the basement cafeteria on lunch
>>>
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>>> *From:* Leann Ogasawara >>> <mailto:leann.ogasaw...@canonical.com>>
>>>> *Date:* February 7, 2014
align with our planning?
>
> Stephen Michael Kellat
> In the basement cafeteria on lunch
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Leann Ogasawara
> *Date:* February 7, 2014, 11:00:12 AM EST
> *To:* ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.co
tu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com>,
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>
*Subject:* *[RFC] 12.04.5*
Hi All,
With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of
having a 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releas
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Stephen Michael Kellat
wrote:
> FYI
>
> How does this align with our planning?
If it goes as smoothly as past point releases, it would require us to
do testing of the ISOs but I don't think much else (unless we want
to).
--
Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph || Lyz || pl
sts.ubuntu.com
>> <mailto:ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com>,
>> ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com>
>> *Subject:* *[RFC] 12.04.5*
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of
>> hav
On 02/07/2014 11:00 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
+1
I don't think we can reasonably do anything else.
--
Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
sig
FYI
How does this align with our planning?
Stephen Michael Kellat
In the basement cafeteria on lunch
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Leann Ogasawara
> Date: February 7, 2014, 11:00:12 AM EST
> To: ubuntu-rele...@lists.ubuntu.com, ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
> Subject: [
On 02/07/2014 09:00 AM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of
> having a 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
+1
--
Tim Gardner tim.gard...@canonical.com
--
ubuntu-devel mailing list
ubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settin
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:20:06AM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> >
> > With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> > 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
>
> FWIW, I think the engineering burden for d
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 08:00:12AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
>
> With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
> 12.04.5 point release for Precise.
FWIW, I think the engineering burden for doing this is worth the trade
off for it being The Right Thing To Do.
...
Hi All,
With 12.04.4 having just released, I wanted to propose the idea of having a
12.04.5 point release for Precise.
As many are aware, recent 12.04.x point releases have shipped with a newer
kernel and X stack by default for hardware enablement purposes.
Maintainers of these enablement stacks
22 matches
Mail list logo
