On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give 12.10
users a decent interval to upgrade.
Agreed. I understand the desire to cut costs, but giving people zero
days to switch over after we didn't tell them
On Friday, March 01, 2013 08:15:13 PM Evan Dandrea wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Scott Kitterman ubu...@kitterman.com
wrote:
No would be a good time to be discussing this change for after 14.04.
Doing this mid LTS - LTS cycle is going to be problematic for a variety
of reasons. I
The proposal is silent on the upgrade path for 12.10 users? Presumably 12.10
- 14.04 LTS upgrades will be supported. Unfortunately, support for 12.10
runs out at just about the same time 14.04 is supposed to be release.
Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 06:24:59PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
The proposal is silent on the upgrade path for 12.10 users? Presumably 12.10
- 14.04 LTS upgrades will be supported. Unfortunately, support for 12.10
runs out at just about the same time 14.04 is supposed to be release.
Scott Kitterman [2013-02-28 18:24 -0500]:
Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give 12.10
users a decent interval to upgrade.
+1 on that from me as well, unless it turns out in discussions that we
are doing 13.04 after all, and only drop 13.10.
Martin
--
Martin
On Friday, March 01, 2013 06:16:18 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
Scott Kitterman [2013-02-28 18:24 -0500]:
Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give
12.10 users a decent interval to upgrade.
+1 on that from me as well, unless it turns out in discussions that we
are
On Friday, March 01, 2013 12:36:43 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 06:16:18 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
Scott Kitterman [2013-02-28 18:24 -0500]:
Perhaps it would make sense to extend 12.10 support by 6 months to give
12.10 users a decent interval to upgrade.
+1 on that
On 02/28/2013 09:36 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Friday, March 01, 2013 06:16:18 AM Martin Pitt wrote:
+1 on that from me as well, unless it turns out in discussions that we
are doing 13.04 after all, and only drop 13.10.
Now would be a good time to be discussing this change for after
