On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:47:05 +0100
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:19:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:47:10 pm Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > > Why are we convinced throwin
On 22/10/10 10:52, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 05:00:22PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>> In an ideal world I would agree with you, but unfortunately things
>> rarely work out that way.
>>
>> A _bug report_ is not the same thing as a _bug_. As best it's a grainy,
>> fuzzy photo
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 05:00:22PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> In an ideal world I would agree with you, but unfortunately things
> rarely work out that way.
>
> A _bug report_ is not the same thing as a _bug_. As best it's a grainy,
> fuzzy photo of something that *might* have been a bug at
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:19:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:47:10 pm Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > Why are we convinced throwing away bugs is a good idea?
> >
> > Thank you for helping to mak
Hello all,
Deryck Hodge [2010-10-15 8:31 -0500]:
> Ubuntu is already configured to take advantage of automatic expiry.
I'm glad to hear this, thanks! Anything which will help to clear up
the clutter and avoid unnecessary manual work is greatly welcome. So
far we have to weed out the "died" incom
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 06:19:07PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:47:10 pm Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > > On Friday, October 15, 2010 09:31:38 am Deryck Hodge wrote:
> > > > These individual scripts
On Friday, October 15, 2010 05:47:10 pm Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Friday, October 15, 2010 09:31:38 am Deryck Hodge wrote:
> > > Hi, all.
> > >
> > > I'm sure many of you may have heard by now, but we're getting close to
> > >
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:44:17PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Friday, October 15, 2010 09:31:38 am Deryck Hodge wrote:
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > I'm sure many of you may have heard by now, but we're getting close to
> > re-enabling automatic bug expiry on Launchpad. There's a post about
> > th
On Friday, October 15, 2010 09:31:38 am Deryck Hodge wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm sure many of you may have heard by now, but we're getting close to
> re-enabling automatic bug expiry on Launchpad. There's a post about
> this on the Launchpad blog:
>
> http://blog.launchpad.net/general/enabling-aut
Hi, all.
I'm sure many of you may have heard by now, but we're getting close to
re-enabling automatic bug expiry on Launchpad. There's a post about
this on the Launchpad blog:
http://blog.launchpad.net/general/enabling-automatic-bug-expiry
What do you mean "re-enabling"?
--
10 matches
Mail list logo